我国医学研究机构科研竞争力评价需求分析

目的分析我国医学研究机构科研竞争力的评价需求，为后续评价方向提供指引。方法在文献调研和前期研究的基础上，初步筛选出我国机构分学科评价等9个评价方向，并编制问卷。选取医学研究机构竞争力评价的主要关注者与参与者作为调查对象，包括医学研究人员、医学科研管理人员和科研管理研究人员共90名，通过面对面访谈和邮件调查的方式，针对初步筛选出的9个评价方向的关注度展开问卷调查。通过构建关注度指数和非参数检验分析不同评价方向受关注程度的差异性，从而选出关注程度较高的评价方向。结果检验结果显示9个评价方向的关注度指数不同，差异有高度统计学意义（P=0．00）。受关注程度较高的评价方向包括：我国机构分学科评价、我国机构总体评价、国际机构分学科评价、国际机构总体评价（关注度指数的秩均值分别为：418、416、399、389）。各地区省区分学科评价和各地区／省区总体评价受关注程度较低（关注度指数的秩均值分别为：295、251）。结论我国医学研究机构科研竞争力评价需求较高的评价方向是我国机构分学科评价、我国机构总体评价、国际机构分学科评价和国际机构总体评价评价。各地区／省区分学科评价和各地区，省区总体评价受关注程度较低。

Requirement investigation of scientific research competitiveness evaluation of medical research institutions in China

Objective To investigate the main stakeholders interested in scientific research competitiveness evaluation of Chinese medical research institutions in order to analyze their requirements for scientific research competitiveness evaluation of Chinese medical research institutions and provide guidance for follow-up evaluation directions. Methods Nine directions for scientific research competitiveness evaluation of Chinese medical research institutions in the study were selected and the questionnaire on the basis of literature review and preliminary researches were developed. Main stakeholders and participants of scientific research competitiveness evaluation of medical research institutions as research objects in the study were selected, including 90 medical researchers, medical research management staffs and scientific research management researchers. Face-to-face interview and E-mail interview were used to conduct questionnaire survey on the importance paid to the 9 evaluation directions selected in preliminary research. Importance index was developed and nonparametric test was applied to assess the difference regarding the importance attached to different evaluation directions in order to select evaluation directions with greater importance. Results Nonparametric test indicated that the 9 evaluation directions had different importance index, with statistical significance （P = 0.00）. Scientific research competitiveness evaluation of Chinese medical research institutions by discipline and in general, scientific research competitiveness evaluation of internationally renowned medical research institutions by discipline analysis and in general were more important than others （mean rank of importance index was： 418, 416, 399, 389）. Scientific research competitiveness evaluation of provincial medical research institutions in general and by discipline were less important （mean rank of importance index was： 295, 251）. Conclusion There is relatively greater requirement for scientific research competitivene