护理干预对小儿呼吸道阻塞性疾病抢救成功率的影响

目的探讨护理干预在提高小儿呼吸道阻塞性疾病抢救成功率中的作用。方法选取浙江省临海市第一人民医院收治的呼吸道阻塞性疾病患儿92例,随机分为常规护理组和护理干预组。常规护理组患儿由医务人员给予常规护理和观察,而护理干预组患儿则在常规护理观察的基础上,给予护理干预。对两组抢救成功率、重症并发症发生率、护理满意度等指标进行统计分析,探讨护理干预的应用价值。结果常规护理组和护理干预组患儿的抢救成功率分别为80.43%和95.65%（P〈0.05）;病死率分别为15.22%和2.17%（P〈0.05）;而重症并发症的发生率分别为39.13%和19.57%（P〈0.05）。两组患儿的护理满意度分别为78.26%和93.48%,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。两组患儿康复情况以及住院时间比较,护理干预组患儿康复情况明显好于常规护理组,且住院时间明显缩短（P〈0.05）。结论护理干预的施行可明显提高小儿呼吸道阻塞性疾病抢救成功率,降低患儿的病死率,并可有效缩短患儿的住院时间,是值得临床推广的护理方案。

Influence of nursing intervention on rescue success rate of pediatric obstructive airway diseases

Objective To discuss the role of nursing interventions in improvement of rescue success rate of pediatric obstructive airway diseases. Methods 92 cases of patients with pediatric airway obstructive diseases were selected in the First People＇s Hospital of Linhai City. All patients were randomly assigned to routine nursing group and nursing intervention group. Patients in the routine nursing group were given routine nursing and observation. Patients in the nursing intervention group were given nursing intervention on the basis of routine nursing. The indexes of rescue success rate, incidence of severe complications, nursing satisfaction were analyzed, and the application value of nursing intervention was discussed. Results In the routine nursing group and nursing intervention group, the survival rate were80.43% and 95.65% retrospectively（P〈0.05）; the mortality rates were 15.22% and 2.17%（P〈0.05）; the incidence of severe complications were 39.13% and 19.57% respectively（P〈0.05）, all the differences were statistically significant.The nursing satisfaction of the two groups were 78.26% and 93.48% respectively, the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. The recovery and hospital stays were compared between the two groups, in the nursing intervention group, the recovery was better and hospital stays was shorter than the routine nursing group（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Nursing intervention can significantly improve the rescue success rate of pediatric obstructive airway disease, reduce child mortality rate, and effectively shorten the hospital stay, which is a care program worthy of clinical promotion.