首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

京津冀三地75起放射卫生行政处罚典型案例分析
引用本文:申立军,董振军,畅晋,尹俊清,冯冬颖.京津冀三地75起放射卫生行政处罚典型案例分析[J].中国辐射卫生,2019,28(5):586-589.
作者姓名:申立军  董振军  畅晋  尹俊清  冯冬颖
作者单位:河北省卫生和计划生育委员会综合监督执法局, 河北 石家庄 050071
摘    要:目的 通过选取京津冀三地2015—2017年的75起放射卫生行政处罚典型案例相关情况进行分析,分析放射卫生监督执法案件及查处过程中存在的主要问题和原因,为做好放射卫生管理工作提供对策与数据支持。方法 选取京津冀近三年的放射卫生行政处罚典型案例,从地域分布、处罚主体、处罚案由、处罚种类等方面进行统计分析。结果 2015—2017年京津冀三地共查办75起放射卫生行政处罚典型案例,以2016年查办案例数为最多35起(占46.7%);被处罚主体为一级及以上医疗机构59起(占78.7%);处罚案由主要是设备场所未检测或放射诊疗建设项目未经竣工验收(占26.7%);罚款数额3 000元以下31起(占44.9%)。结论 应充分认识放射卫生监督的重要性,尽快完善放射卫生相关法律法规,加大放射卫生行政处罚力度、强化放射知识和法律法规培训宣传,提高放射卫生监督执法质量和水平。

关 键 词:京津冀  放射卫生  行政处罚  案例分析  
收稿时间:2019-01-15

Analysis of 75 cases administrative penalties typical case for radiological health in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei
SHEN Lijun,DONG Zhenjun,CHANG Jin,YIN Junqing,FENG Dongying.Analysis of 75 cases administrative penalties typical case for radiological health in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Health,2019,28(5):586-589.
Authors:SHEN Lijun  DONG Zhenjun  CHANG Jin  YIN Junqing  FENG Dongying
Institution:Hebei Health and Family Planning Comprehensive Supervision, Shijiazhuang 050071 China
Abstract:Objective Through the selection of 75 administrative penalties typical cases of radiological health in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei from 2015 to 2017, to analyze the main problems and causes in the radiological health supervision and law enforcement cases as well as the investigation and penalty process, so as to provide countermeasures and data support for radiological health management. Methods The typical cases of radiological health administrative punishment in recent three years were selected from Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei, and the statistical analysis was carried out from the aspects of geographical distribution, punishment subject, punishment cause and punishment type. Results There were 75 typical cases of administrative punishment on radiological health supervision in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from 2015 to 2017, among which 35 cases (46.7%) were investigated and handled in 2016, the main body of punishment was the first and above hospitals (59cases), accounting for 78.7%; The punishment cases were mainly due to the equipment sites not tested or radiological diagnosis and construction project not completed and accepted (accounting for 26.7%); 31 cases (accounting for 44.9%) were fined under 3 000 yuan. Conclusion It is necessary to fully understand the importance of radiological health supervision, improve the relevant laws and regulations on radiological health as soon as possible, increase the administrative punishment of radiological health, strengthen the training and publicity of radiology knowledge and laws and regulations, then improve the quality and level of radiological health supervision and law enforcement.
Keywords:Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei  Radiological Health  Administrative Penalty  Case Analysis  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国辐射卫生》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国辐射卫生》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号