首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


The clinical utility of the continuous performance test and objective measures of activity for diagnosing and monitoring ADHD in children: a systematic review
Authors:Charlotte L Hall  Althea Z Valentine  Madeleine J Groom  Gemma M Walker  Kapil Sayal  David Daley  Chris Hollis
Institution:1.Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, CLAHRC-EM,Institute of Mental Health,Nottingham,UK;2.Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology,Institute of Mental Health,Nottingham,UK;3.Developmental Psychiatry, School of Medicine,University of Nottingham,Nottingham,UK;4.Centre for ADHD and Neuro-developmental Disorders Across the Lifespan (CANDAL),Institute of Mental Health,Nottingham,UK;5.School of Medicine,University of Nottingham,Nottingham,UK;6.Centre for ADHD and Neuro-developmental Disorders Across the Lifespan (CANDAL),University of Nottingham,Nottingham,UK;7.MindTech, Developmental Psychiatry, Queen’s Medical Centre,University of Nottingham,Nottingham,UK
Abstract:Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is typically diagnosed using clinical observation and subjective informant reports. Once children commence ADHD medication, robust monitoring is required to detect partial or non-responses. The extent to which neuropsychological continuous performance tests (CPTs) and objective measures of activity can clinically aid the assessment and titration process in ADHD is not fully understood. This review describes the current evidence base for the use of CPTs and objectively measured activity to support the diagnostic procedure and medication management for children with ADHD. Four databases (PsycINFO, Medline, Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED), and PsycARTICLES) were systematically searched to understand the current evidence base for (1) the use of CPTs to aid clinical assessment of ADHD; (2) the use of CPTs to aid medication management; and (3) the clinical utility of objective measures of activity in ADHD. Sixty relevant articles were identified. The search revealed six commercially available CPTs that had been reported on for their clinical use. There were mixed findings with regard to the use of CPTs to assess and manage medication, with contrasting evidence on their ability to support clinical decision-making. There was a strong evidence base for the use of objective measures of activity to aid ADHD/non-ADHD group differentiation, which appears sensitive to medication effects and would also benefit from further research on their clinical utility. The findings suggest that combining CPTs and an objective measure of activity may be particularly useful as a clinical tool and worthy of further pursuit.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号