Comparison of articaine and bupivacaine/lidocaine for single medial canthus peribulbar anaesthesia

In a single-centre, randomized, double-blind study, we comparedthe efficacy of 2% articaine with that of a mixture of 0.5%bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine for peribulbar anaesthesia in cataractsurgery, using a single medial canthus injection technique.Eighty-two patients were allocated randomly to receive 7–9 mlof a mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine or an equalvolume of 2% articaine with 1:200 000 epinephrine. Hyaluronidase30 iu ml^–1 was added to both solutions. Thedegree of akinesia was scored 1, 5 and 10 min after theblock, at the end of surgery and at discharge from the day caseunit. Primary outcome measures were the difference in ocularmovement scores 5 min after block and the need for supplementaryinferolateral injections. There was greater akinesia in thearticaine group at 5 min (P=0.01). Ten patients (24%) inthe articaine group and 21 patients (51%) in the bupivacaine/lidocainegroup required a supplementary injection (P=0.02). The mean(SD) volume of local anaesthetic required to achieve adequateblock for surgery was 9.7 (2.1) ml in the articaine group and11.0 (2.2) ml in the bupivacaine/lidocaine group (P=0.01). Therewas a faster offset of akinesia after surgery in the articainegroup (P=0.01). There were no differences between groups inthe incidence of reported pain or of minor complications. Inour study, 2% articaine with 1:200 000 epinephrine wassafe and efficacious for single medial canthus peribulbar anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 584–7