首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Juxtametallic Bipolar Bone Radiofrequency Ablation: Thermal Monitoring in an Ex-Vivo Model with Specimen MRI and Histopathologic Correlation
Institution:1. Division of Interventional Radiology. Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina;2. Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina;3. Section of Orthopaedic Oncology, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina;4. Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina;5. Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina;6. Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina;7. Duke Orthopedic Oncology Bone Metastasis Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina;8. Duke Cancer Institute Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina;9. Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia;10. Duke Interventional Radiology Translational Research Laboratory, Durham, North Carolina
Abstract:PurposeTo measure the ablation zone temperature and nontarget tissue temperature during radiofrequency (RF) ablation in bone containing metal instrumentation versus no metal instrumentation (control group).Materials and MethodsEx vivo experiments were performed on 15 swine vertebrae (control, n = 5; titanium screw, n = 5; stainless steel screw, n = 5). Screws and RF ablation probe were inserted identically under fluoroscopy. During RF ablation (3 W, 5 minutes), temperature was measured 10 mm from RF ablation centerpoint and in muscle contacting the screw. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, gross pathologic, and histopathologic analyses were performed on 1 specimen from each group.ResultsAblation zone temperatures at 2.5 and 5 minutes increased by 12.2 °C ± 2.6 °C and 21.5 °C ± 2.1 °C (control); 11.0 °C ± 4.1 °C and 20.0 °C ± 2.9 °C (juxta-titanium screw), and 10.0 °C ± 3.4 °C and 17.2 °C ± 3.5 °C (juxta–stainless steel) screw; differences among groups did not reach significance by analysis of variance (P = .87). Mixed-effects linear regression revealed a statistically significant increase in temperature over time in all 3 groups (4.2 °C/min ± 0.4 °C/min, P < .001). Compared with the control, there was no significant difference in the temperature change over time for titanium (?0.3 °C/min ± 0.5 °C/min, P = .53) or steel groups (?0.4 °C/min ± 0.5 °C/min, P = .38). The mean screw temperature at the final time point did not show a statistically significant change compared with baseline in either the titanium group (?1.2 °C ± 2.3 °C, P = .50) or steel group (2.6 °C ± 2.9 °C, P = .11). MR imaging and pathologic analyses revealed homogeneous ablation without sparing of the peri-hardware zones.ConclusionsAdjacent metallic instrumentation did not affect the rate of or absolute increase in temperature in the ablation zone, did not create peri–metallic ablation inhomogeneities, and did not result in significant nontarget heating of muscle tissue in contact with the metal instrumentation.
Keywords:ANOVA"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0015"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"analysis of variance  FDA"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0025"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"Food and Drug Administration  MR"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0035"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"magnetic resonance  RF"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0045"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"radiofrequency
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号