首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Perspective on Riddle and Dumenci’s ‘Commentary on finding meaning in patient-reported outcome change scores: a seemingly unquenchable thirst for understanding’
Affiliation:2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Mailstop 1046, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA;3. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA;4. Department of Epidemiology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA;6. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA;5. Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA;11. Department of Radiology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA;2. Centre for Orthopaedic & Trauma Research, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia;3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA;4. Orthopaedic and Trauma Service, The Royal Adelaide Hospital and the Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
Abstract:
Keywords:Minimal clinically important difference (MCID)  Minimal important change (MIC)  Patient-reported outcome (PRO)
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号