首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同潮气量通气患者液体治疗时每搏量变异度判断扩容效应的阈值
引用本文:蔡勤芳,袁维秀,米卫东. 不同潮气量通气患者液体治疗时每搏量变异度判断扩容效应的阈值[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2010, 30(7). DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1416.2010.07.017
作者姓名:蔡勤芳  袁维秀  米卫东
作者单位:1. 海军总医院麻醉科
2. 解放军总医院麻醉手术中心,北京市,100853
摘    要:目的 确定不同潮气量通气患者液体治疗时每搏量变异度(SVV)判断扩容效应的阈值.方法 拟在全麻下行胃肠手术的患者50例,ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,年龄20~75岁,随机分为2组(n=25):潮气量8 ml/kg组(V1组)和潮气量10 ml/kg组(V2组).麻醉诱导后以0.4 ml·kg-1·min-1的速率静脉输注6%羟乙基淀粉130/0.4氯化钠注射液,输注量7 ml/kg.于液体治疗前即刻(T1)和液体治疗结束后3 min(T2)时记录MAP、HR、CVP、CI、SVV、每搏指数(SVI)、体循环血管阻力指数(SVRI),计算SVV和CI的变化率(△SVV和△CI).以△CI≥15%为扩容有效标准,绘制SVV判断扩容效应的ROC曲线,确定诊断阈值.结果 ROC曲线分析结果:V1组SVV的诊断阈值为10.5%,判断扩容有效的灵敏度为93.3%,特异度为75.0%;V2组SVV的诊断阈值为13.5%,判断扩容有效的灵敏度为87.5%,特异度为85.7%;V1组SVV判断扩容有效的ROC曲线下面积及其95%可信区间为0.946(0.860~1.031),V2组为0.951(0.868~1.034).V1组和V2组△SVV与△CI呈负性相关,相关系数分别为-0.553和-0.602(P<0.01).结论 潮气量为8 ml/kg和10 ml/kg机械通气下,SVV判断患者液体治疗时扩容有效的阈值分别为10.5%和13.5%.

关 键 词:每搏输出量  呼吸,人工  血管容量

The threshold of stroke volume variation in determining volume expansion responsiveness during fluid therapy in patients ventilated with different tidal volumes
CAI Qin-fang,YUAN Wei-xiu,MI Wei-dong. The threshold of stroke volume variation in determining volume expansion responsiveness during fluid therapy in patients ventilated with different tidal volumes[J]. Chinese Journal of Anesthesilolgy, 2010, 30(7). DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1416.2010.07.017
Authors:CAI Qin-fang  YUAN Wei-xiu  MI Wei-dong
Abstract:Objective To determine the threshold of stroke volume variation (SVV) in determining the volume expansion responsiveness during fluid therapy in patients ventilated with different tidal volumes. Methods Fifty ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients aged 20-75 yr undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery under general anesthesia were randomly divided into 2 tidal volume groups (n = 25 each):group Ⅰ VT 8 ml/kg (group V1) and group ⅡVT 10 ml/kg (group V2). Radial artery was cannulated and connected to Vigelo monitor for continuous monitoring of cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) and SVV. Internal jugular vein was cannulated for CVP monitoring. Anesthesia was induced with milazolam, propofol, fentanyl and rocuronium and maintained with intravenous propofol and remifentanil infusion. BIS was maintained at 40-50 during anesthesia. The patients were intubatel and mechanically ventilated (VT 8/10 ml/kg, RR 8-12 bpm, oxygen flow 2 L/min). 6% HES 130/0.4 7 ml/kg was infused iv at a rate of 0.4 ml·kg-1 ·min-1 after induction of anesthesia. MAP, HR, CVP, CI, SVV, SVI and SVRI were recorded before and at 3 min after fluid therapy. The changing rate of SVV (△SVV) and CI (△CI) were calculated. The criterion for effective volume expansion was △CI 15%. The ROC curve for SVV in determring the volume expansion responsiveness was plotted and the diagnostic threshold was determined. Results ROC curve showed that the diagnostic threshold of SVV was 10.5 % in group V1 and 13.5% in group V2. The sensitivity and specificity in determining effective volume expansion were 93.3 % and 75.0 % in group V1 and 87.5 % and 85.7 % in group V2 respectively. The area under the curve for SVV and 95% confidence interval (CI) were 0.946 (0.860-1.031) in group V1 and 0.951 (0.868-1.034) in group V2. △SVV was negatively correlated with △CI in group V1 (=0.553) and V2 (= 0.602). Conclusion The threshold of SVV in determining the volume expansion responsiveness during fluid therapy is 10.5% and 13.5% in mechanically ventilated patients with tidal volume of 8 and 10 ml/kg respectively.
Keywords:Stroke volume  Respiration,artificial  Vascular capacitance
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号