首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Chemoprophylaxis during transrectal prostate needle biopsy: critical analysis through randomized clinical trial
Authors:Ahmed?M.?Elshal  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:elshalam@hotmail.com"   title="  elshalam@hotmail.com"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author,Ahmed?M.?Atwa,Ahmed?R.?El-Nahas,Mohamed?A.?El-Ghar,Asaad?Gaber,Essam?Elsawy,Abdelwahab?Hashem,Yasser?Farag,Hashim?Farg,Ali?Elsorougy,Mohamed?Fouda,Hossam?Nabeeh,Ahmed?Mosbah
Affiliation:1.Prostate Unit, Urology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center,Mansoura University,Mansoura,Egypt;2.Radiology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center,Mansoura University,Mansoura,Egypt;3.Microbiology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center,Mansoura University,Mansoura,Egypt
Abstract:

Purpose

To compare the efficacy of three chemoprophylaxis approaches in prevention of post-transrectal biopsy infectious complications (TBICs).

Methods

Patients were randomly assigned to receive ciprofloxacin 3 days 500 mg B.I.D 3 days starting the night prior to biopsy (standard prophylaxis), augmented prophylaxis using ciprofloxacin and single preprocedure shot of 160 mg gentamicin IM (augmented prophylaxis) and rectal swab culture-based prophylaxis (targeted prophylaxis). Patients were assessed 2 weeks prior to biopsy, at biopsy and 2 weeks after. Primary end point was occurrence of post-TBICs that included simple UTI, febrile UTI or sepsis. Secondary end points were post-biopsy change in the inflammatory markers (TLC, ESR and CRP), unplanned visits, hospitalization and occurrence of fluoroquinolones resistance (FQ-R; bacterial growth on MacConkey agar plate with 10 μg/ml ciprofloxacin) in the fecal carriage of screened men.

Results

Between April/2015 and January/2017, standard, augmented and targeted prophylaxes were given to 163, 166 and 167 patients, respectively. Post-TBICs were reported in 43 (26%), 13 (7.8%) and 34 (20.3%) patients following standard, augmented and targeted prophylaxes protocols, respectively (P?=?0.000). Post-TBICs included UTI in 23 (4.6%), febrile UTI in 41 (8.2%) and sepsis in 26 (5.2%) patients. Significantly lower number of post-biopsy positive urine culture was depicted in the augmented group (P?=?0.000). The number of biopsy cores was statistically different in the three groups (P?=?0.004). On multivariate analysis, augmented prophylaxis had independently lower post-TBICs (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.4, P?=?0.000) when compared with the other two groups regardless of the number of biopsy cores taken (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.95–1.17, P?=?0.229). Post-biopsy hospitalization was needed in four (2%), one (0.6%) and ten (6%) patients following standard, augmented and targeted prophylaxes, respectively (P?=?0.014). However, sepsis-related hospitalization was not statistically different. Post-biopsy changes in the inflammatory markers were significantly less in augmented prophylaxis (P?

Conclusion

Augmented prophylaxis with single-dose gentamicin is an effective and practical approach. Targeted prophylaxis might be reserved for cases with contraindication to gentamicin.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号