首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


The clinical evaluation of the CADence device in the acoustic detection of coronary artery disease
Authors:Joseph L Thomas  Michael Ridner  Jason H Cole  Jeffrey W Chambers  Sabahat Bokhari  Demetris Yannopoulos  Morton Kern  Robert F Wilson  Matthew J Budoff
Institution:1.Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor UCLA,Torrance,USA;2.Heart Center Research,Huntsville,USA;3.Cardiology Associates,Mobile,USA;4.Metropolitan Heart and Vascular Institute,Minneapolis,USA;5.Columbia University,New York,USA;6.University of Minnesota,Minneapolis,USA;7.University of California – Irvine,Irvine,USA;8.Harbor UCLA Medical Center,Torrance,USA
Abstract:The noninvasive detection of turbulent coronary flow may enable diagnosis of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) using novel sensor and analytic technology. Eligible patients (n?=?1013) with chest pain and CAD risk factors undergoing nuclear stress testing were studied using the CADence (AUM Cardiovascular Inc., Northfield MN) acoustic detection (AD) system. The trial was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority of AD for diagnostic accuracy in detecting significant CAD as compared to an objective performance criteria (sensitivity 83% and specificity 80%, with 15% non-inferiority margins) for nuclear stress testing. AD analysis was blinded to clinical, core lab-adjudicated angiographic, and nuclear data. The presence of significant CAD was determined by computed tomographic (CCTA) or invasive angiography. A total of 1013 subjects without prior coronary revascularization or Q-wave myocardial infarction were enrolled. Primary analysis was performed on subjects with complete angiographic and AD data (n?=?763) including 111 subjects (15%) with severe CAD based on CCTA (n?=?34) and invasive angiography (n?=?77). The sensitivity and specificity of AD were 78% (p?=?0.012 for non-inferiority) and 35% (p?<?0.001 for failure to demonstrate non-inferiority), respectively. AD results had a high 91% negative predictive value for the presence of significant CAD. AD testing failed to demonstrate non-inferior diagnostic accuracy as compared to the historical performance of a nuclear stress OPC due to low specificity. AD sensitivity was non-inferior in detecting significant CAD with a high negative predictive value supporting a potential value in excluding CAD.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号