首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

标准化与常规命题在医学生考试中的对比分析
引用本文:杨斯韬,李浩源,杨金晶.标准化与常规命题在医学生考试中的对比分析[J].昆明医学院学报,2009,30(7):128-130.
作者姓名:杨斯韬  李浩源  杨金晶
作者单位:1. 昆明医学院教务处,云南,昆明,650031
2. 昆明市卫生学校,云南,昆明,650032
摘    要:目的对比分析标准化命题与常规命题在医学生考试中优缺点.方法对昆明医学院2004级临床医学专业250名学生《内科学》分别进行标准化命题和常规命题考试,通过对两种考试进行试卷分析和成绩分析,对比标准化命题与常规命题在医学生考试中的优缺点.结果标准化命题试卷的难度为0.75,区分度为0.35,信度为0.65,成绩分布为正态分布.常规命题试卷难度为0.76,区分度为0.1,信度为0.1,成绩分布为正态分布.结论在难度相近的情况下,标准化命题试卷的区分度、信度、可靠系数都优于常规命题试卷.

关 键 词:标准化  考试  医学生

Comparative Analysis of the Standardized Test and General Test in Medical Students
YANG Si-tao,LI Hao-yuan,YANG Jin-jing.Comparative Analysis of the Standardized Test and General Test in Medical Students[J].Journal of Kunming Medical College,2009,30(7):128-130.
Authors:YANG Si-tao  LI Hao-yuan  YANG Jin-jing
Institution:YANG Si - tao , LI Hao - yuan , YANG Jin - jing (1. Dept. of, Kunming Medical University, Kunming Yunnan 650031 ; 2 . Kunming Medical School, Kunming Yunnan 650032, China)
Abstract:Objective To analyze and compare the advantage and shortage of the standardized test and general test in medical students. Methods Standardized test and general test were performed in 250 clinical students of Kunming medical college .After analyzing the scores and test papers of these two tests. We compared the advantage and shortage of the standardized test and general test in medical students. Results The diffieulty of the standardized test was 0.75 ; discrminability was 0.35, reliability was 0.5. The difficulty of the general test was 0.76, discrminability was 0.1, reliability was 0.1. Conclusion Under the same difficulty, the discrminability, reliability of the standardized test is better than the general test.
Keywords:Standardization  Test  Medical Students
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号