首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Peribulbar versus Retrobulbar Anesthesia for Ophthalmic Surgery: An Anatomical Comparison of Extraconal and Intraconal Injections
Authors:Ripart, Jacques M.D., Ph.D.   Lefrant, Jean-Yves M.D., Ph.D.&#x     de La Coussaye, Jean-Emmanuel M.D., Ph.D.&#x     Prat-Pradal, Dominique M.D., Ph.D.      Vivien, Bruno M.D.&#x     Eledjam, Jean-Jacques M.D.#
Affiliation:Ripart, Jacques M.D., Ph.D.*; Lefrant, Jean-Yves M.D., Ph.D.†; de La Coussaye, Jean-Emmanuel M.D., Ph.D.‡; Prat-Pradal, Dominique M.D., Ph.D.§; Vivien, Bruno M.D.∥; Eledjam, Jean-Jacques M.D.#
Abstract:Background: Peribulbar and retrobulbar anesthesia have long been opposed on the basis of the existence of an intermuscular membrane, which is supposed to separate the intraconal from the extraconal spaces in a water-tight fashion. A local anesthetic injected outside the cone should spread through this septum to reach the nerves to be blocked. The existence of this septum is questioned. The aim of this study was to compare the spread of a colored latex dye injected intraconally or extraconally to simulate both retrobulbar and peribulbar anesthesia.

Methods: The authors used 10 heads from human cadavers. For each head, one eye was injected intraconally, and the other eye was injected extraconally. The heads were then frozen and sectioned into thin slices following various planes. They were then photographed and observed.

Results: There was no evidence of the existence of an intermuscular septum separating the intraconal and extraconal spaces. Those two spaces appeared to be part of a common spreading space, the corpus adiposum of the orbit.

Keywords:
点击此处可从《Anesthesiology》浏览原始摘要信息
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号