首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing for the treatment of simple and incomplete complex types of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 18 months old
Authors:Bahram Eshraghi  Elias Khalilipour  Kambiz Ameli  Fatemeh Bazvand
Institution:Eye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:This article compares the success rate of pushed monocanalicular intubation (Masterka) versus probing for the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) in children older than 18 months. In a non-random comparative study, 90 eyes with CNLDO underwent either Masterka (45 eyes) or probing (45 eyes). All procedures were performed by one oculoplastic surgeon. The tubes were removed 2 months after the operation. Complete resolution was defined as complete absence of clinical signs and symptoms of CNLDO at 6 months after the procedure. The mean age at the time of treatment was 28 ± 18.2 months for Masterka and 26.7 ± 18.6 months for probing group. Treatment success was achieved in 33 of 45 eyes (73.3%) in the Masterka group compared with 22 of 45 eyes (48.9%) in the probing group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.017). For the treatment of CNLDO, Masterka might be more effective than probing in children older than 18 months.
Keywords:Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction  Masterka  probing  pushed monocanalicular intubation
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号