Management of Appendiceal Mass and Abscess. An 11-Year Experience

The aim of our study is to compare the results of emergency surgery versus conservative treatment with interval surgery in patients diagnosed with appendiceal mass and abscess. A retrospective review of 48 patients with appendiceal mass and abscess treated from January 2002 to January 2013 at General Surgery Department of Kipshidze Central University Hospital was performed. Patients with emergency surgery were compared to patients treated by nonoperative management with interval surgery. Demographics, clinical profile, and operative outcomes were studied. The emergency surgery group included 25 patients, and the interval surgery group included 23 patients. The clinical characteristics of the emergency surgery and interval surgery groups were not statistically different. In the emergency surgery group, an open appendectomy was performed on 17 patients, and colonic resections (ileocecectomy or right hemicolectomy) were performed on 8 patients. In the interval surgery group, an open appendectomy was performed on 21 patients, and colonic resections were performed on 2 patients. There were no statistical differences in types of surgery, postoperative complications, operation time without colonic resections, and postoperative hospitalization period among these 2 groups. Operation time with colonic resections was of greater duration in the emergency surgery group than in the interval surgery group (P = 0.04). Both treatment methods for appendiceal mass and abscess have the same results. The surgeon must consider clinical symptoms and results of investigations in each particular case when choosing an appropriate treatment method. Prospective randomized controlled trials are required for comparing the results of all 3 treatment methods of appendiceal mass.Key words: Appendicitis, Mass, Abscess, Appendectomy, Ileocecectomy, Right hemicolectomyAcute appendicitis is one of the most frequent acute surgical pathologies. The inflammation in acute appendicitis may sometimes be fixed by the patient''s own defense mechanisms, by the formation of an inflammatory mass (an appendiceal phlegmon) or a circumscribed abscess (an appendiceal abscess), often presenting as a palpable mass days following the onset of symptoms. This complication occurs in 2 to 7% of all cases of appendicitis.^1,2Management of appendiceal mass and abscess is either operative or conservative. More evidence is needed to identify which method is superior.¹ Immediate appendectomy may be technically demanding because of the distorted anatomy and difficulties in closing the appendiceal stump due to the inflamed tissues. According to the aforementioned, the operation could be finished with colonic resections (ileocecectomy or right hemicolectomy).^2–4Conservative management with interval appendectomy has traditionally remained the gold standard management. The need for interval appendectomy after a successful nonsurgical treatment has recently been questioned as the risk of recurrence is relatively small.^5–7 After successful nonsurgical treatment of an appendiceal mass, the true diagnosis is uncertain in some cases and underlying diagnosis of cancer or Crohn''s disease (CD) may be delayed.^1,8,9The aim of our study is to compare the results of emergency surgery versus conservative treatment followed by elective surgery in patients diagnosed with appendiceal mass and abscess.