首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Expectations for Phase-Appropriate Drug Substance and Drug Product Specifications for Early-Stage Protein Therapeutics
Authors:Juliana Kretsinger  Neha Frantz  Scott A Hart  Wayne P Kelley  Bob Kitchen  Shawn Novick  Barbara Rellahan  Daniela Stranges  Corné JM Stroop  Ping Yin  Martin H Gastens
Institution:1. Bioproduct Analytical Development, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285;2. Biogen, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709;3. Product Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903;4. Biopharmaceutical Development and Supply, GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406;5. Pfizer Inc., Andover, Massachusetts 01810;6. Seattle Genetics, Bothell, Washington 98021;7. Amgen, Homer Building, Washington, District of Columbia 20005;8. Technical Research and Development, GSK Vaccines srl, 53100, Siena, Italy;9. Biologics and Vaccines Analytics, MSD, Oss, the Netherlands;10. Analytical Development, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts 02210;11. NBE Development, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois 60064
Abstract:Early-phase specifications are established to ensure that materials used in clinical studies have appropriate product quality, reducing the risk of harm to patients. Currently, guidance is available for specification setting practices at commercial phase. With very limited data and manufacturing experience available, it is not possible to fully align to these expectations at the start of clinical trials. A survey was performed among 19 biopharmaceutical companies to gather information about the current practices for setting specifications in early-phase development. The results indicate that most companies develop platform approaches to support setting specifications at the first-in-human clinical trial stage of development. Based on shared learning across multiple companies, example specification approaches for monoclonal antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates are included. General principles of the example specifications can also be applied to other protein therapeutics and vaccines. Strategies for justification of acceptance criteria are described, along with discussion of considerations for some specific tests. Options for use of non-numerical acceptance criteria are also discussed. While specifications for each molecule must be set considering available molecule-specific information, the presented information leverages shared learning from multiple companies, to provide guidance for early phase specification setting strategies.
Keywords:antibody drug(s)  monoclonal antibody(s)  antibody drug conjugate(s) (ADC)  physicochemical properties  drug-like property(s)  protein aggregation  analytical chemistry  degradation product(s)  ADC  antibody drug conjugate  CDCL  clonally derived cell line  CE-SDS  capillary electrophoresis sodium dodecyl sulfate  CFU  colony forming unit  CQA  critical quality attribute  DAR  drug antibody ratio  DNA  deoxyribonucleic acid  DP  drug product  DS  drug substance  ELISA  enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay  EP  European Pharmacopeia  EU  endotoxin unit  FIH  first in human  GMP  good manufacturing practice  HPLC  high-performance liquid chromatography  ICE  isoelectric capillary electrophoresis  ICH  International Conference on Harmonization  IEX  ion exchange chromatography  IND  Investigational new drug application  IQ  International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development  kg  kilogram  mAb  monoclonal antibody  MFI  MicroFlow Imaging  MP  main peak  mg  milligram  mL  milliliter  μm  micrometer  ng  nanogram  NLT  not less than  NMT  not more than  SDS-PAGE  sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis  SEC  size exclusion chromatography  TAV  total acidic variants  TBV  total basic variants  USP  United States Pharmacopeia  UV  ultraviolet light  WHO  World Health Organization
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号