宫腔镜联合腹腔镜下输卵管疏通术治疗女性不孕症的临床疗效分析

目的探讨宫腔镜联合腹腔镜下输卵管疏通术治疗女性不孕症的临床疗效.方法选取来我院就诊的不孕症患者160例,分为宫腔镜组（对照组）和宫腹腔镜联合组（观察组）,分别进行宫腔镜下输卵管疏通术以及宫腹腔镜联合下输卵管疏通术,对二者的临床疗效进行分析比较.结果对照组80例患者54例输卵管通畅,再通率为67.5％,观察组80例患者有74例输卵管通畅,再通率为92.5％,两组患者的再通率比较具有统计学显著性差异,观察组显著地高于对照组;对照组患者原发性不孕症38例,通畅32例,再通率为84.2％,观察组患者原发性不孕症39例,通畅35例,再通率为89.7％,两组原发性不孕症患者再通率比较不具有统计学显著性差异;对照组患者继发性不孕症42例,通畅22例,再通率为52.4％,观察组患者继发性不孕症41例,通畅39例,再通率为95.1％,两组继发性不孕症患者再通率比较具有统计学显著性差异,观察组继发性不孕症患者的输卵管再通率显著高于对照组.结论宫腔镜联合腹腔镜行输卵管疏通术治疗不孕症特别在治疗继发性不孕症患者中疗效比宫腔镜下行输卵管疏通术更好,是一种治疗输卵管阻塞不孕症的安全有效的方法.

Clinical Analysis of Oviduct Dredging Skill in the Treatment of Female Infertility Under Hysteroscopy Combined with Laparoscopy

Objective To investigate clinical effect of hysteroscopy laparoscopic surgical treatment of female infertility. Methods 160 cases of infertility were divided into hysteroscopy group （control group） and laparoscopy combined group （observation group）, and compare the effect of two group. Results 54 cases in the control group clear tubal patency, recanalization rate was 67.5%, 74 cases in the observation group clear tubal patency, recanalization rate was 92.5%, with statistically significant differences. Conclusion Hysteroscopy laparoscopic tubal infertility treatment dredge particularly in treating patients with secondary infertility than hysteroscopic surgery down the fallopian tube, is a treatment for tubal obstruction infertility safe and effective method.