Biofeedback Training for Partial Weight Bearing in Patients After Total Hip Arthroplasty |
| |
Authors: | Zoltan Pataky MD, Diego De Le n Rodriguez, Alain Golay MD, Mathieu Assal MD, Jean-Philippe Assal MD,Claude-Alain Hauert PhD |
| |
Affiliation: | aService of Therapeutic Education for Chronic Diseases, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre, Department of Community Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland;bService of Orthopedics, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland;cPsychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland;dFoundation for Research and Training in Patient Education, Geneva, Switzerland |
| |
Abstract: | Pataky Z, De León Rodriguez D, Golay A, Assal M, Assal J-P, Hauert C-A. Biofeedback training for partial weight bearing in patients after total hip arthroplasty.ObjectiveTo evaluate a new biofeedback training method based on visual delivery of information in patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA).DesignIntervention study with prepost design.SettingHospitalized care in a university referral center.ParticipantsPatients (N=11) (age 56.1±9.0y) shortly after THA.InterventionA mobile system has been used for biofeedback training with the predefined partial weight bearing (PWB) threshold of 20kg. After the learning period, 4 retention tests, consisting of 3 successive walking cycles without feedback, were recorded for each patient: (1) acquisition test, (2) early retention test (after 30min), (3) the day after, and (4) after 2 days.Main Outcome MeasureThe pressure error and the maximum pressure force at each step before and after biofeedback training.ResultsA significant difference of pressure errors between the beginning and the end of the learning period has been measured (42.5±22.5N vs 3.7±11.4N, P<.001). However, there was no difference between the beginning of the learning period and different retention tests (after 30 minutes, after 1 day, after 2 days). In terms of maximal pressure force, there was a difference between the beginning and the end of learning (251N vs 195N, P<.05). The retention tests did not show significant differences compared with the baseline values.ConclusionsTHA patients were able to use the defined PWB during a short period of time and shortly after stopping the training; both the pressure errors and the maximal pressure force attended the values before training. These results confirm the difficulties to achieve PWB in patients after THA. |
| |
Keywords: | Arthroplasty, replacement, hip Biofeedback Rehabilitation |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|