铸瓷贴面与全瓷冠在前牙美学修复中的应用效果比较

探讨铸瓷贴面与全瓷冠在前牙美学修复中的应用效果。方法 选取2021年1月-2022年1月于 固原市人民医院行前牙美学修复治疗的70例患者为研究对象，应用随机数字表法分为A组与B组，各 35例。A组给予铸瓷贴面法治疗，B组给予全瓷冠修复术治疗，比较两组修复效果、VAS评分、修复满意 度及不良反应发生情况。结果 A治疗后颜色评分、形态评分、半透明度评分、边缘美观评分均高于B组 （P ＜0.05）；A组治疗后2、6、12个月VAS评分均低于B组（P ＜0.05）；A组修复满意度为97.14%，高于 B组的80.00%（P ＜0.05）；A组不良反应发生率为5.71%，低于B组的28.57%（P＜0.05）。结论 前牙美学修 复中，应用铸瓷贴面治疗，其整体效果优于全瓷冠修复，能减少不良反应的发生，降低患者的疼痛感和不 适感，具有更优的美学效果。

Effect Comparison Between Ceramic Laminate Veneer and All-ceramic Crown in Aesthetic Restoration of Anterior Teeth

To explore the application effect of ceramic laminate veneer and all-ceramic crown in aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth. Methods A total of 70 patients who underwent aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth in Guyuan People''s Hospital from January 2021 to January 2022 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into group A and group B by random number table method, with 35 patients in each group. Group A was treated with ceramic laminate veneer, and group B was treated with all-ceramic crown repair. The repair effect, VAS score, repair satisfaction and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results After treatment, the color score, shape score, semi-transparency score and edge beauty score of group A were higher than those of group B (P <0.05). The VAS score of group A was lower than that of group B at 2, 6 and 12 months after treatment (P <0.05). The repair satisfaction of group A was 97.14%, which was higher than 80.00% of group B (P <0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in group A was 5.71%, which was lower than 28.57% in group B (P <0.05). Conclusion In the aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth, the application effect of ceramic laminate veneer is better than that of all-ceramic crown restoration, which can reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions, reduce the pain and discomfort of patients, and has better aesthetic effect.