首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


The total margin of exposure of ethanol and acetaldehyde for heavy drinkers consuming cider or vodka
Institution:1. School of Science, Engineering and Technology, Abertay University, Dundee, Scotland, UK;2. Canadian Institute of Fermentation Technology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada;3. International Centre for Brewing and Distilling, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton. Edinburgh, UK;1. Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, UK;2. NIHR School for Public Health Research, UK;3. NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West, UK;4. School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK;5. SPECTRUM Consortium, UK;6. Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK;7. School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, UK;8. Institute for Social Marketing & Health, University of Stirling, UK;9. Boston University School of Public Health, USA;10. School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, UK;11. Alcohol Focus Scotland, UK;12. Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, UK
Abstract:Heavy drinkers in Scotland may consume 1600 g ethanol per week. Due to its low price, cider may be preferred over other beverages. Anecdotal evidence has linked cider to specific health hazards beyond other alcoholic beverages. To examine this hypothesis, nine apple and pear cider samples were chemically analysed for constituents and contaminants. None of the products exceeded regulatory or toxicological thresholds, but the regular occurrence of acetaldehyde in cider was detected. To provide a quantitative risk assessment, two collectives of exclusive drinkers of cider and vodka were compared and the intake of acetaldehyde was estimated using probabilistic Monte–Carlo type analysis. The cider consumers were found to ingest more than 200-times the amount of acetaldehyde consumed by vodka consumers. The margins of exposure (MOE) of acetaldehyde were 224 for the cider and over 220,000 for vodka consumers. However, if the effects of ethanol were considered in a cumulative assessment of the combined MOE, the effect of acetaldehyde was minor and the combined MOE for both groups was 0.3. We suggest that alcohol policy priority should be given on reducing ethanol intake by measures such as minimum pricing, rather than to focus on acetaldehyde.
Keywords:Alcohol  Cider  Vodka  Heavy drinking  Acetaldehyde  Risk assessment  Ethanol (PubChem CID: 702)  Acetaldehyde (PubChem CID: 177)  Sulphur dioxide (PubChem CID: 1119)  5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (PubChem CID: 237332)  Methanol (PubChem CID: 887)
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号