首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

绝经后妇女原发性高脂血症4种治疗方案的疗效及成本-效果分析
引用本文:吴飞跃,贝金币.绝经后妇女原发性高脂血症4种治疗方案的疗效及成本-效果分析[J].药物流行病学杂志,2014(2):108-111.
作者姓名:吴飞跃  贝金币
作者单位:浙江省舟山医院药剂科;(浙江舟山 316000);浙江省舟山医院内科(浙江舟山 316000)
摘    要:目的:比较4种抗绝经后妇女原发性高脂血症方案的临床疗效和安全性,用药物经济学方法进行成本-效果分析。方法:采用随机对照临床研究方法,将符合标准的患者随机分成A组(阿托伐他汀钙片)、B组(瑞舒伐他汀钙片)、C组(非诺贝特缓释胶囊)和D组(非诺贝特缓释胶囊联合辛伐他汀分散片)。疗程均为2个月。治疗前后分别测定各组患者总胆固醇(TC)、三酰甘油(TG)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)等指标,进行成本-效果分析及安全性评价。结果:A、B、C、D组患者2个月的治疗成本分别为265.8元、246.6元、235.2元和364.5元。在TC、TG和HDL-C等指标上c组成本-效果比最小。在LDI-C指标上B组方案最优。结论:当绝经后妇女原发性高脂血症患者的体检结果以LDL-C过高为主,可优先选择B组方案,如主要问题为TC、TG和HDL.C超标时,可优先选择C组方案。

关 键 词:阿托伐他汀钙  瑞舒伐他汀钙  非诺贝特  辛伐他汀  成本  效果分析  高脂血症  绝经期妇女

Cost-effectiveness Analysis and Safety Evaluation of Four Kinds of Primary HyperUpidemia Treatment Programs for Postmenopausal Women
Wu Feiyue and Bei Jinbi.Cost-effectiveness Analysis and Safety Evaluation of Four Kinds of Primary HyperUpidemia Treatment Programs for Postmenopausal Women[J].Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology,2014(2):108-111.
Authors:Wu Feiyue and Bei Jinbi
Institution:Wu Feiyue Bei Jinbi Department of Pharmaceutics ,2 Department of Internal Medicine, Zhoushan Hospital, Zhoushan 316000, Zhejiang,China
Abstract:Objective: To compare the clinical effects of 4 kinds of treatment programs for postmenopausal women on primary hypedipidemia, and to analyze their cost-effectiveness and evaluate their safety with the medical economics method. Methods:The randomized controlled clinical study was used. 104 postmenopausal women with primary hyperlipi-demia were divided into 4 group: Group A (atorvastatin calcium tablets), Group B (rosuvastatin calcium tablets ), Group C (fenofibrate sustained-release capsules) and Group D( fenofibrate sustained-release capsules combined with simvastatin dis- persible tablets), respectively. The patients were treated for 2 months. Such indicators as TC, TG, LDL-C HDL-C were measured before and after the treatment. The cost-effectiveness ratio and safety evaluation were analyzed. Results:The cost of Group A, B, C and D was 265.8,246.6, 235.2 and 364.5 RMB, respectively. After the analysis, the cost-effective-ness ratio of Group C was the lowest in their TC, TG and HDL-C indicators and that of Group B was the lowest in the LDL-C indicator. Conclusion:When TC, TG and HDL-C for postmenopausal women were high, they could select Group C pro- gram while those who had their high LDL-C could select Group B program.
Keywords:Atorvastatin calcium  Rosuvastatin calcium  Fenofibrate  Simvastatin  Cost-effectiveness analysis  Hy- perlipidemias  Menopause
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号