首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Is the Front Line Prepared for the Changing Faces of Patients? Predictors of Cross-Cultural Preparedness Among Clinical Nurses and Resident Physicians in Lausanne,Switzerland
Authors:Alejandra Casillas  Sophie Paroz  Alexander R. Green  Hans Wolff  Orest Weber  Florence Faucherre
Affiliation:1. Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland;2. Department of Community Medicine and Public Health, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland;3. Disparities Solutions Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;4. Department of Primary Care, Community Medicine, and Emergencies, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland;5. Department of Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
Abstract:Phenomenon: Assuring quality medical care for all persons requires that healthcare providers understand how sociocultural factors affect a patient's health beliefs/behaviors. Switzerland's changing demographics highlight the importance of provider cross-cultural preparedness for all patients—especially those at risk for social/health precarity. We evaluated healthcare provider cross-cultural preparedness for commonly encountered vulnerable patient profiles. Approach: A survey on cross-cultural care was mailed to Lausanne University hospital's “front-line healthcare providers”: clinical nurses and resident physicians at our institution. Preparedness items asked “How prepared do you feel to care for … ?” (referring to example patient profiles) on an ascending 5-point Likert scale. We examined proportions of “4 – well/5 – very well prepared” and the mean composite score for preparedness. We used linear regression to examine the adjusted effect of demographics, work context, cultural-competence training, and cross-cultural care problem awareness, on preparedness. Findings: Of 885 questionnaires, 368 (41.2%) were returned: 124 (33.6%) physicians and 244 (66.4%) nurses. Mean preparedness composite was 3.30 (SD = 0.70), with the lowest proportion of healthcare providers feeling prepared for patients “whose religious beliefs affect treatment” (22%). After adjustment, working in a sensitized department (β = 0.21, p = .01), training on the history/culture of a specific group (β = 0.25, p = .03), and awareness regarding (a) a lack of practical experience caring for diverse populations (β = 0.25, p = .004) and (b) inadequate cross-cultural training (β = 0.18, p = .04) were associated with higher preparedness. Speaking French as a dominant language and physician role (vs. nurse) were negatively associated with preparedness (β = ?0.26, p = .01; β = ?0.22, p = .01). Insights: The state of cross-cultural care preparedness among Lausanne's front-line healthcare providers leaves room for improvement. Our study points toward institutional strategies to improve preparedness: notably, making sure departments are sensitized to cross-cultural care resources and increasing provider diversity to reflect the changing Swiss demographic.
Keywords:cultural competency  health disparities  cross-cultural preparedness
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号