Informed Decision Making About Prostate Cancer Testing in Predominantly Immigrant Black Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| |
Authors: | Stephen J. Lepore Ph.D. Randi L. Wolf Ph.D. Charles E. Basch Ph.D. Melissa Godfrey M.P.H. Emma McGinty M.S. Celia Shmukler M.D. Ralph Ullman M.B.A. Nigel Thomas M.P.H. Sally Weinrich Ph.D. |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Public Health, Temple University, 9th Floor Ritter Annex, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA 2. Columbia University, New York, NY, USA 3. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA 4. 1199SEIU Benefit and Pension Funds, New York, NY, USA 5. Medical College of Georgia (Emeritus), Augusta, GA, USA
|
| |
Abstract: | Background Decision support interventions have been developed to help men clarify their values and make informed decisions about prostate cancer testing, but they seldom target high-risk black and immigrant men. Purpose This study evaluated the efficacy of a decision support intervention focused on prostate cancer testing in a sample of predominantly immigrant black men. Methods Black men (N?=?490) were randomized to tailored telephone education about prostate cancer testing or a control condition. Results Post-intervention, the intervention group had significantly greater knowledge, lower decision conflict, and greater likelihood of talking with their physician about prostate cancer testing than the control group. There were no significant intervention effects on prostate specific antigen testing, congruence between testing intention and behavior, or anxiety. Conclusions A tailored telephone decision support intervention can promote informed decision making about prostate cancer testing in black and predominantly immigrant men without increasing testing or anxiety. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|