首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


The predictive validity of selection for entry into postgraduate training in general practice: evidence from three longitudinal studies
Authors:Fiona Patterson  Filip Lievens  Máire Kerrin  Neil Munro  Bill Irish
Institution:University of Cambridge and director, Work Psychology Group.;Department of Personnel Management and Work and Organizational Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium.;Work Psychology Group, Derbyshire.;Department of Health Care Management and Policy, University of Surrey.;Health Education Southwest, Taunton.
Abstract:

Background

The selection methodology for UK general practice is designed to accommodate several thousand applicants per year and targets six core attributes identified in a multi-method job-analysis study

Aim

To evaluate the predictive validity of selection methods for entry into postgraduate training, comprising a clinical problem-solving test, a situational judgement test, and a selection centre.

Design and setting

A three-part longitudinal predictive validity study of selection into training for UK general practice.

Method

In sample 1, participants were junior doctors applying for training in general practice (n = 6824). In sample 2, participants were GP registrars 1 year into training (n = 196). In sample 3, participants were GP registrars sitting the licensing examination after 3 years, at the end of training (n = 2292). The outcome measures include: assessor ratings of performance in a selection centre comprising job simulation exercises (sample 1); supervisor ratings of trainee job performance 1 year into training (sample 2); and licensing examination results, including an applied knowledge examination and a 12-station clinical skills objective structured clinical examination (OSCE; sample 3).

Results

Performance ratings at selection predicted subsequent supervisor ratings of job performance 1 year later. Selection results also significantly predicted performance on both the clinical skills OSCE and applied knowledge examination for licensing at the end of training.

Conclusion

In combination, these longitudinal findings provide good evidence of the predictive validity of the selection methods, and are the first reported for entry into postgraduate training. Results show that the best predictor of work performance and training outcomes is a combination of a clinical problem-solving test, a situational judgement test, and a selection centre. Implications for selection methods for all postgraduate specialties are considered.
Keywords:general practice  postgraduate  reliability and validity  student selection
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号