A Comparison Between Unstemmed and Stemmed Constrained Condylar Knee Prostheses in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score‐Matched Analysis

ObjectiveTo compare and analyze the clinical outcomes between unstemmed and stemmed constrained condylar knees (CCK) in complex primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in terms of implant survivorship, change in outcome evaluations, and complications.MethodsWe reviewed 156 consecutive patients who received primary TKA using PFC®SIGMA®TC3 (TC3) of constrained condylar design between January 2009 and January 2017 at our institution. After removing patients who met exclusion criteria, 25 patients were identified as unstemmed TC3 cases and 81 as stemmed TC3 cases. Propensity score matching was used to select 25 stemmed cases as a control group for the unstemmed group with comparable preoperative conditions including preoperative demographics, preoperative diagnosis, preoperative range of motion, main reason to use TC3, ASA score (American Society of Anesthesiologists), and follow‐up duration. Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluations including Knee Society Score (KSS), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, the 12‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey (SF‐12), and the range of motion (ROM) were obtained and compared. The instability, periprosthetic fracture, radiolucent lines, polyethylene wear, and heterotrophic ossification were assessed according to the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the knee. The complications and implant survivorship between the two groups were also recorded and compared.Results3After the index surgery, both groups showed substantial improvement in KSS (knee and function), HSS score, SF‐12, and ROM compared with baseline. There was no significant difference in the mean KSS scores (knee and function), HSS score, SF‐12, and ROM between the unstemmed and stemmed group postoperatively. No statistically significant difference was found in the overall complication rate between the two groups. The overall Kaplan–Meier survivorship was 98.0% (95% confidence interval 94.1%–100.0%) at 7 years. No significant difference was found in the survival rate between the unstemmed group (100.0%) and the stemmed group (96.0%) at 7 years (log rank, P = 0.317). The mean duration of follow‐up was 7.0 years for unstemmed group and 7.7 years for stemmed group.ConclusionsIn patients with adequate bone stock receiving complex primary TKA, unstemmed CCK could achieve similar clinical outcomes at mid‐term follow‐up as stemmed CCK.