聚甲酚磺醛不同给药方法治疗宫颈糜烂疗效观察

目的探讨聚甲酚磺醛不同给药方法治疗宫颈糜烂的临床疗效。方法对180例宫颈糜烂患者随机分为3组，A组（60例）采用聚甲酚磺醛溶液＋聚甲酚磺醛栓治疗，B组（60例）单用聚甲酚磺醛栓治疗，以C组（60例）为对照组，采用复方莪术油栓治疗。比较3组临床疗效。结果A、B、C组治愈率分别为71．7％、38．3％、6．7％，总有效率分别为100．0％、95．0％、66．7％。3组临床疗效经统计学处理，差异有统计学意义（χ^2=75．38，P〈0．01），A、B2组临床疗效均优于对照组，且以A组疗效更佳。结论聚甲酚磺醛不同给药方法治疗宫颈糜其疗效不同，其中以聚甲酚磺醛溶液与栓剂联合应用较为合理。

The clinical curative effect of policresulen different methods to treat patients with cervical erosion

Objective To approach the chnieal effect of policresulen different methods in the treatment for patients with cervical erosion. Methods 180 patients were divided into 3 groups randomly, A group（60 cases） were given polieresulen suppository and polieresuien solution, B group （60 cases）were given policresulen suppository, control groups C were given compound zedoary turmeric oil suppository. The clinical curative effect of 3 groups had been compared. Results A, B and C groups cure rate to be 71.7% ,38.3%and 6. 7% respectively , were 100. 0% ,95.0% and 66. 7% always efficiently respectively. There was significant differenee（χ^2 =75. 38 ,P 〈 0. 01 ）, show clinical curative effects of A and B group were better than to compare group, and with A, it was much better to organize curative effect. Conclusion The clinical effect was different for policresulen different methods. In which, policresulen suppository combined with policresulen solution was relatively reasonable.