首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

胸中段淋巴结阳性食管癌术后放疗的临床意义
引用本文:于舒飞,章文成,肖泽芬,周宗玫,张红星,陈东福,冯勤付,梁军,吕纪马,赫捷,高树庚,薛奇,毛友生,孙克林,刘向阳,程贵余,方德康,李鉴.胸中段淋巴结阳性食管癌术后放疗的临床意义[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2016(4):332-338.
作者姓名:于舒飞  章文成  肖泽芬  周宗玫  张红星  陈东福  冯勤付  梁军  吕纪马  赫捷  高树庚  薛奇  毛友生  孙克林  刘向阳  程贵余  方德康  李鉴
作者单位:1. 100021北京协和医学院中国医学科学院肿瘤医院放疗科;2. 100021北京协和医学院中国医学科学院肿瘤医院放疗科; 300000 天津肿瘤医院放疗科;3. 100021北京协和医学院中国医学科学院肿瘤医院胸外科
摘    要:目的:分析和研究淋巴结阳性的胸中段食管癌术后放疗能否提高生存率,同时对放疗范围提出进一步修改的建议。方法分析2004—2009年在我院手术的有淋巴结转移的胸中段食管鳞癌患者286例,其中手术196例,术后IMRT 90例。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算生存率并Logrank法检验,Cox模型多因素预后分析,采用χ2检验分析不同治疗方式对复发的影响。结果单一手术组( S)和术后放疗组( S+R)5年OS分别为22.9%和37.8%,中位生存时间分别为23.2个月和34.7个月(P=0.003);淋巴结转移(LNM)1-2个S组和S+R组的5年OS分别为27.3%和44.8%(P=0.017), LNM≥3个S组和S+R组的5年OS分别为16.7%和25.0%( P=0.043)。 S组N1、N2、N3期腹腔淋巴结转移失败率分别为2.9%、10.9%、20.0%(P=0.009)。 S+R组与S组比较纵隔淋巴结转移失败率明显降低( LNM 1-2个:S+R 8.0%, S 35.3%, P=0.003;LNM≥3个时, S+R 10.0%, S 42.3%, P=0.001)且明显延长了复发时间( S+R 25.1个月与S10.7个月,P=0.000)。但LNM≥3个S+R组的血道转移失败率明显高于S组(46.7%比26.1%,P=0.039)。结论胸中段食管癌淋巴结阳性患者能从术后放疗中获益。 LNM 1-2个可缩小照射范围。 LNM≥3个时妥协放疗剂量是否比妥协照射范围更合理还需前瞻性研究。血道转移失败率高,为化疗提供了治疗依据。

关 键 词:食管肿瘤/术后放射疗法:放射疗法  调强  预后

Clinical value of postoperative radiotherapy for node-positive middle thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and modification of target volume
Abstract:Objective To analyze the clinical value of postoperative radiotherapy for node-positive middle thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma ( TESCC ) and to modify the target volume .Methods A total of 286 patients with node-positive middle TESCC underwent radical surgery in Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, from 2004 to 2009.In addition, 90 of these patients received postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy.The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates, and the log-rank test was used for survival difference analysis.The Cox model was used for multivariate prognostic analysis.The chi-square test was used for comparing the recurrence between patients receiving different treatment modalities.Results The 5-year overall survival ( OS) rates of the surgery alone ( S) group and surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy ( S+R) group were 22.9%and 37.8%, respectively, and the median OS times were 23.2 and 34.7 months, respectively ( P=0.003) .For patients with 1 or 2 lymph
node metastases (LNMs), the 5-year OS rates of the S group and S+R group were 27.3%and 44.8%, respectively ( P=0.017);for patients with more than 2 LNMs, the 5-year OS rates of the S group and S+R group were 16.7%and 25.0%, respectively (P=0.043).The peritoneal lymph node metastasis rates of N1 , N2 , and N3 patients in the S group were 2.9%, 10.9%, and 20.0%, respectively ( P=0.024) .The S+R group had a significantly lower mediastinal lymph node metastasis rate than the S group ( for patients with 1 or 2 LMNs:8.0%vs.35.3%, P=0.003;for patients with more than 2 LNMs, 10.0%vs.42.3%, P=0.001) , and had a prolonged recurrence time compared with the S group ( 25.1 vs.10.7 months, P=0.000) .However, for patients with more than 2 LNMs, the S+R group had a significantly higher hematogenous metastasis rate than the S group (46.7%vs.26.1%, P=0.039).Conclusions Patients with node-positive middle TESCC could benefit from postoperative radiotherapy.The target volume can be reduced for patients with 1 or 2 LNMs.Prospective studies are needed to examine whether it is more appropriate to reduce the radiotherapy dose than to reduce the target volume for patients with more than 2 LNMs.A high hematogenous metastasis rate warrants chemotherapy as an additional regimen.
Keywords:Eesophageal neoplasms/postoperative radiotherapy  Radiotherapy  intensity-modulated  Prognosis
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号