首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Secondary conditions in a community sample of people with spinal cord damage
Authors:Peter W New
Institution:1. Spinal Rehabilitation Service, Caulfield Hospital, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia;2. Principal Researcher, Epworth-Monash Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Southern Medical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia;3. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health &4. Preventive Medicine, Monash University, VIC, Australiap.new@cgmc.org.au
Abstract:Objective: To compare secondary conditions in people with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) and non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction (SCDys).

Design: Survey; completed August 2012 – June 2013.

Setting: Community, Australia.

Participants: Adults with spinal cord damage from any cause.

Interventions: Nil.

Outcome Measures: Demographic and clinical variables and the SCI-Secondary Conditions Scale (SCI-SCS).

Results: Survey completed by 150 people: 112 (74.7%) with traumatic SCI and 38 (25.3%) with non-traumatic SCDys a median of 10 years post onset. No significant difference (t?=?–0.6, P?=?0.6) in the total SCI-SCS score between those with SCI (mean 13.7) and SCDys (mean 14.4). Except for bladder problems (SCDys mean?=?1.5, SD?=?1.1; SCI mean?=?1.0, SD=1.1; t?=?–2.6, P?=?0.01) there were no significant differences between the aetiology groups regarding the conditions comprising the SCI-SCS (all other P values >0.1). The most common significant or chronic problems from the SCI-SCS were: sexual problems 41%; chronic pain 24%; bladder dysfunction 17%; spasms 17%; joint and muscle pain 15%; bowel dysfunction 14%; circulation problems 14%; contractures 9%; urinary tract infections 9%; pressure ulcer 7% and postural hypotension 5%. A linear regression analysis found that tetraplegia and higher disability were the only variables that significantly influenced (R2?=?0.13; P?=?0.005) the total SCI-SCS score and that sex, age, years post injury and etiology of spinal cord damage had no influence.

Conclusions: Secondary conditions following spinal cord damage do not appear to be influenced by etiology. Prevention and management of secondary conditions following need to consider people with non-traumatic SCDys as well as those with traumatic SCI.
Keywords:Spinal cord diseases  Complications  Survey  Psychometrics
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号