首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Methodological criteria for the assessment of moderators in systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials: a consensus study
Authors:Tamar Pincus   Clare Miles   Robert Froud   Martin Underwood   Dawn Carnes  Stephanie JC Taylor
Affiliation:(1) Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, UK;(2) Centre for Health Sciences, Institute of Health Science Education, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK;(3) Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
Abstract:

Background  

Current methodological guidelines provide advice about the assessment of sub-group analysis within RCTs, but do not specify explicit criteria for assessment. Our objective was to provide researchers with a set of criteria that will facilitate the grading of evidence for moderators, in systematic reviews.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号