Methodological criteria for the assessment of moderators in systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials: a consensus study |
| |
Authors: | Tamar Pincus Clare Miles Robert Froud Martin Underwood Dawn Carnes Stephanie JC Taylor |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, UK;(2) Centre for Health Sciences, Institute of Health Science Education, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK;(3) Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK |
| |
Abstract: | Background Current methodological guidelines provide advice about the assessment of sub-group analysis within RCTs, but do not specify explicit criteria for assessment. Our objective was to provide researchers with a set of criteria that will facilitate the grading of evidence for moderators, in systematic reviews. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|