首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

经皮气管切开术与传统气管切开术在临床应用的比较
引用本文:冀宏斌,刘强,张艳艳,周海青,马宁.经皮气管切开术与传统气管切开术在临床应用的比较[J].川北医学院学报,2017,32(6):861-863.
作者姓名:冀宏斌  刘强  张艳艳  周海青  马宁
作者单位:邯郸市第一医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,河北邯郸,056002;邯郸市第一医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,河北邯郸,056002;邯郸市第一医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,河北邯郸,056002;邯郸市第一医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,河北邯郸,056002;邯郸市第一医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,河北邯郸,056002
摘    要:目的:探讨经皮气管切开术(percutaneous tracheostomy,PT)在临床上的应用价值。方法:回顾分析本院660例行气管切开术的患者资料,随机分为PT组和传统气管切开(open tracheostomy,OT)组,各330例。观察两组的切口大小、术中出血量、手术时间、切口愈合时间,并比较两组术中、术后并发症的发生率。结果:PT组的切口大小、术中出血量、手术时间、切口愈合时间均小于OT组,具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。且PT组的术中、术后并发症发生率低于OT组,具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:PT可以替代OT。

关 键 词:经皮气管切开术  传统气管切开术  临床应用

Comparison of clinical application between percutaneous tracheostomy and open tracheostomy
Abstract:Objective:To discuss the application value of percutaneous tracheostomy for patients.Methods:660 patients with tracheostomy were randomly divided into percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) and open tracheostomy (OT),each group had 330 cases.The incision size,intraoperative blood loss,operative time,incision healing time and incidence of complications in the two groups were compared.Results:The incision size,intraoperative blood loss,operative time,incision healing time and incidence of complications of PT group were less than those of OT group with statistical difference (P < 0.05).Conclusion:It's reasonable to widely use PT to replace OT.
Keywords:Percutaneous Tracheostomy  Open tracheostomy  Clinical application
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号