首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

手感法和电测法确定根管工作长度的研究
引用本文:路文阁,李雨琴.手感法和电测法确定根管工作长度的研究[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2002,16(1):43-45.
作者姓名:路文阁  李雨琴
作者单位:1. 北京大学口腔医学院牙体牙髓科,100081,路文阁现在北京外国语大学校医院口腔科
2. 北京大学口腔医学院牙体牙髓科,100081
摘    要:目的 研究手感法和电测法的临床应用。方法 对118个根管用手感法和电测法分别测量其工作长度,并与X线法确定的真实工作长度相比较。结果 手感法测准确率为73.7%,而电测法准确率则高达96.3%;在根周有病变级和根周无病变组,手感法测准确率为60%和88%,电测法准确率达98.3%和94.8%;手感法准确度和电测法准确度均与牙位无统计学差异。结论 电测法比手感法的测量准确度高,且不受患牙情况影响,但手感法的准确度基本能满足正常临床需要。

关 键 词:手感法  电测法  根管工作长度
修稿时间:2001年1月20日

Analysis of the handing method and the electric method for measuring work length of root canals.
LU Wenge,LI Yuqin. Peking University School of Stomatology,Beijing ..Analysis of the handing method and the electric method for measuring work length of root canals.[J].Journal of Modern Stomatology,2002,16(1):43-45.
Authors:LU Wenge  LI Yuqin Peking University School of Stomatology  Beijing
Institution:LU Wenge,LI Yuqin. Peking University School of Stomatology,Beijing 100081.
Abstract:Objective To study the clinical usage of the handing method(HM) and the electronic method(EM) for measuring work length of root canals.Methods Total 118 root canals required root canal therapy were measured with HM and EM,which was compared with the work length in X-ray measurement.Results The accurate rate of HM was 73.7% ,and the accurate rate of EM was 96.3% .In the apical paradentitis group and the apical non-paradentitis group,the accurate rate of HM was 60% and 88%,and the accurate rate of EM was 98.3% and 94.3% .The accuracy of HM and EM was not related satistically with different position of teeth.Conclusion The accuracy of EM is higher than that of HM and is not related with periapical conditions,but the accuracy of HM can meet normal clinical needs.
Keywords:The handing method    The electronic method    Root canals work length
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号