首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Taming systems to create enabling environments for HCV treatment: Negotiating trust in the drug and alcohol setting
Institution:1. Liver Unit, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain;2. Unidad de Atención a las Drogodependencias ANTAD, Tenerife, Spain;3. Unidad de Atención a las Drogodependencias San Miguel, Tenerife, Spain;4. Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain;5. Central Laboratory Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain;6. Sistemas de Informacion, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Spain;7. Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas CIBICAN, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Psiquiatría y Dermatología, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain;1. Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Level 1, Goodsell Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia;2. The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Level 6, Wallace Wurth Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia;3. Justice and Forensic Mental Health Network, NSW Health, PO Box 150, Matraville, NSW, 2036, Australia
Abstract:HCV (hepatitis C) treatment uptake among the population most affected – people who inject drugs – is suboptimal. Hospital based treatment provision is one evidenced barrier to HCV treatment uptake. In response, HCV treatment is increasingly located in treatment settings seen as more amenable to people who inject drugs, such as drug and alcohol services. We explored the accessibility of HCV treatment provision at two such partnerships. Data collection comprised qualitative interviews collected in 2011 and 2012 with 35 service users and 14 service providers of HCV treatment in London, United Kingdom. We draw here primarily on thematic analyses of service provider accounts, yet narratives relating to trust and environment emerged unsolicited in both user and provider accounts of negotiated HCV treatment access. A key theme in service provider accounts were strategies they deployed to ‘tame’ the treatment system so as to create an ‘enabling environment’ of care, in which trust was a critical feature. This ‘taming’ of the system was enacted through practices of ‘negotiated flexibility’, including in relation to appointments, eligibility, and phlebotomy. Service user accounts accentuated familiar environments and known health providers as those most trusted, and the potentially stigmatising effects of negotiating treatment in unfamiliar territory, especially hospital settings. Whilst noting the effects of provider strategies to negotiate flexibility on behalf of would-be patients seeking treatment, we conclude by noting the limits of trust relations in settings of constrained choice.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号