首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

三种胆道引流手术治疗恶性阻塞性黄疸的疗效分析
引用本文:朱宏毅,沈火剑,李奇为,王银平,刘德军,吴琳石,李可为,季福. 三种胆道引流手术治疗恶性阻塞性黄疸的疗效分析[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2018, 30(6): 467-470. DOI: 10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2018.06.006
作者姓名:朱宏毅  沈火剑  李奇为  王银平  刘德军  吴琳石  李可为  季福
作者单位:(上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院 普外科,上海 200127)
基金项目:上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院南院科研启动基金(2015Q D M S07)
摘    要:[摘 要] 目的 比较经皮肝穿刺胆管引流术(percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage,PTCD)、经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术(percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage,PTGBD)、经内镜鼻胆管引流术(endoscopic nasobiliary drainage,ENBD)治疗恶性阻塞性黄疸的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2012年10月至2017年10月上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院收治的85例实施术前胆道引流的恶性阻塞性黄疸患者的临床资料,根据手术方式将患者分为PTCD组(n=48)、PTGBD组(n=19)和ENBD组(n=18)。比较三组的手术前后血清总胆红素水平、手术成功率、手术时间、术后并发症、术后减黄效果。结果 三组患者术前、术后第3天和第7天总胆红素水平、手术成功率及术后并发症发生率无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。PTGBD组平均手术时间[(14.11±0.6439)min]明显低于PTCD组的(19.07±0.8799)min、ENBD组的(29.67±1.921)min,三组比较有统计学差异(F=916.858,P < 0.001),两两组间比较均有统计学差异(均P < 0.001)。结论 PTCD、PTGBD和ENBD均能达到术前减黄的效果,PTGBD更为便捷、安全。

关 键 词:恶性阻塞性黄疸  经皮肝穿刺胆管引流术  经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术  经内镜鼻胆管引流术  

Analysis of three kinds of biliary drainage methods for treatment of malignant obstructivejaundice
ZHU Hong-yi,SHEN Huo-jian,LI Qi-wei,WANG Yin-ping,LIU De-jun,WU Lin-shi,LI Ke-wei,JI Fu.. Analysis of three kinds of biliary drainage methods for treatment of malignant obstructivejaundice[J]. Journal of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, 2018, 30(6): 467-470. DOI: 10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2018.06.006
Authors:ZHU Hong-yi  SHEN Huo-jian  LI Qi-wei  WANG Yin-ping  LIU De-jun  WU Lin-shi  LI Ke-wei  JI Fu.
Affiliation:Department of General Surgery, Renji Hospital Affiliated to School of Medicine, Shanghai JiaotongUniversity, Shanghai 200127, China
Abstract:Abstractobjective To evaluate the benefits of percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD),percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) and endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) fortreatment of malignant obstructive jaundice. Methods Clinical data of 85 cases with malignant obstructivejaundice collected from Renji Hospital between Oct. 2012 and Oct. 2017 was retrospectively analyzed. Accordingto the operative methods, patients were divided into PTCD group (n=48), PTGBD group (n=19) and ENBDgroup (n=18). Preoperative serum total bilirubin level, success rate of operation, operation duration, postoperativecomplications, postoperative effect were compared among three groups. Results There was no significantdifference in preoperative serum total bilirubin level (F=0.332, P=0.718), postoperative serum total bilirubin in3 days (F=0.688, P=0.505) and 7 days (F=1.502, P=0.229) among the three groups. There was no significantdifference in surgical success rate and postoperative complications (all P>0.05) among the three groups. Theoperation duration of PTGBD group [(14.11±0.6439) min] was obviously less than PTCD group [(19.07±0.8799)min] and ENBD group [(29.67±1.921) min]. There was significant difference in operation duration among thethree groups (F=916.858, P<0.001) and pairwise contrast (P<0.001). Conclusion PTCD, PTGBD and ENBD allcan achieve the effect of reducing jaundice before operation, and PTGBD is more convenient and safer.
Keywords:malignant obstructive jaundice  percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD)  percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD)  endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD)  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《肝胆胰外科杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《肝胆胰外科杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号