Brain impedance variation of directional leads implanted in subthalamic nuclei of Parkinsonian patients |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Neurological Unit I, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy;2. Neurological Unit, S. Maria della Misericordia Universital Hospital, Udine, Italy;3. Neurosurgical Unit, S. Maria della Misericordia Universital Hospital, Udine, Italy;4. Neurosurgical Unit, S. Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy;5. Neurological Unit, Villa Margherita Hospital, Arcugnano, Vicenza, Italy;1. Department of Orthopedics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China;2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Upstate Medical University, State University of New York at Syracuse, Syracuse, NY 10212, USA;3. Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China;4. Department of Orthopedics, The Fifth People''s Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200240, China;1. Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China;2. Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China;3. Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Fengtai Hospital, Beijing, China;4. Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectiveConventional deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems with ring-shaped leads generate spherical electrical fields. In contrast, novel directional leads use segmented electrodes. Aim of this study was to quantify the impedance variations over time in subjects with the directional Cartesia-Boston® system.MethodsImpedance records, programming settings, and clinical data of 11 consecutive Parkinsonian patients implanted with DBS directional leads in two Italian centers (Udine and Vicenza) were retrospectively evaluated. Data were collected before starting stimulation (in the operating room and at days 5 and 40) and after switching stimulation on at the successive follow-up visits (1, 6 and 12 months).ResultsDirectional leads have significantly higher impedance than ring leads. Stimulated contacts had always lower impedance compared to non-stimulated contacts. Before DBS-on, all contacts had higher impedance in the operating room, with an initial decrease five days post-surgery and a subsequent increase at day 40, more evident for directional contacts. The impedance of directional leads increased post-implantation at 1 and 6 months with a plateau at 12 months.ConclusionsThere was a significant difference between the directional and ring leads at baseline (before activation of DBS) and during follow-up (chronic DBS).SignificanceOur study reveals new information about the impedance of segmented electrodes that is useful for patient management during the initial test period, as well as during long-term DBS follow-up. |
| |
Keywords: | Deep brain stimulation Electrodes Electric impedance Parkinson disease Neurostimulation AC-PC" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0035" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" anterior commissure-posterior commissure CAPSIT-PD" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0045" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Core Assessment Program for Surgical Interventions and Transplantation in Parkinson's Disease DBS" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0055" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" deep brain stimulation MDS-UPDRS" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0065" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale PD" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0075" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Parkinson’s disease SD" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0085" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" standard deviation VTA" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0095" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" volume of tissue activated |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|