首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


The interrater reliability of a pain mechanisms-based classification for patients with nonspecific neck pain
Affiliation:1. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium;2. Centre for Musculoskeletal and Neurological Rehabilitation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium;3. Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium;1. Faculty of Health, Therapeutic Process Department, Temuco Catholic University, Temuco, Chile;2. Rehabilitation in Health Research Center (CIRES), Universidad de las Américas, Santiago, Chile;3. School of Health Sciences, Physical Therapy Department, Universidad Gabriela Mistral, Santiago, Chile;4. Faculty of Health, Universidad SEK, Santiago, Chile;1. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, SE 141 83 Huddinge, Sweden;2. Rehabcentralen, Ringvägen 2, SE 831 34 Östersund, Sweden;3. Department of Public Health, County Council, SE 871 85 Härnösand, Sweden
Abstract:ObjectiveTo examine the interrater reliability and agreement of a pain mechanisms-based classification for patients with nonspecific neck pain (NSNP).MethodsDesign – Observational, cross-sectional reliability study with a simultaneous examiner design. Setting: University hospital-based outpatient physical therapy clinic. Participants: A random sample of 48 patients, aged between 18 and 75 years old, with a primary complaint of neck pain was included. Interventions: Subjects underwent a standardized subjective and clinical examination, performed by 1 experienced physical therapist. Two assessors independently classified the participants’ NSNP on 3 main outcome measures. Main outcome measures: The Cohen kappa, percent agreement, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to determine the interrater reliability for (1) the predominant pain mechanism; (2) the predominant pain pattern; and (3) the predominant dysfunction pattern (DP).ResultsThere was almost perfect agreement between the 2 physical therapists’ judgements on the predominant pain mechanism, kappa = .84 (95% CI, .65–1.00), p < .001. There was substantial agreement between the raters’ judgements on the predominant pain pattern and predominant DP with respectively kappa = .61 (95% CI, .42–.80); and kappa = .62 (95% CI, .44–.79), p < .001.Conclusion(s)The proposed classification exhibits substantial to almost perfect interrater reliability. Further validity testing in larger neck pain populations is required before the information is used in clinical settings.Clinical trial registration numberNCT03147508 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03147508).
Keywords:Neck pain  Physical therapy  Classification  Reproducibility of results
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号