首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

黄斑水肿的微视野评估与视力的相关性研究
引用本文:王卓实,林小琳,王欢,夏阳,徐玲,何伟. 黄斑水肿的微视野评估与视力的相关性研究[J]. 国际眼科杂志, 2020, 20(8): 1435-1438
作者姓名:王卓实  林小琳  王欢  夏阳  徐玲  何伟
作者单位:110034 中国辽宁省沈阳市,沈阳何氏眼科医院有限公司;110163 中国辽宁省沈阳市,辽宁何氏医学院;110034 中国辽宁省沈阳市,沈阳何氏眼科医院有限公司
基金项目:沈阳市中青年科技创新人才支持计划(No.RC190172)
摘    要:

目的:分析不同疾病引起的黄斑水肿患者微视野检查与视力的相关性。

方法:纳入黄斑水肿患者127例164眼,其中年龄相关性黄斑病变(ARMD)38例38眼,视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)43例43眼,糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)46例83眼。所有患者均行最佳矫正视力(BCVA),光学相干断层扫描仪(OCT)及黄斑微视野检查,并进行统计学分析。

结果:黄斑水肿患者的总体视网膜平均敏感度(MS)、固视率(P1,P2)与BCVA呈正相关,而黄斑视网膜厚度(CRT)与BCVA呈负相关。ARMD组MS与BCVA呈正相关,而固视率及CRT与BCVA不相关; DME组和视网膜中央静脉阻塞(CRVO)组中MS及P1,P2与BCVA均呈正相关,DME组CRT与BCVA呈负相关,CRVO组CRT则与BCVA不相关; 视网膜分支静脉阻塞(BRVO)组MS和CRT与BCVA均不具相关性。

结论:微视野检查对ARMD患者的评估可能比OCT更能反映黄斑功能的变化,在CRVO及DME的患者中微视野作为主观评价指标与OCT有协同作用,而在BRVO患者中微视野的评价仍需进一步研究。

关 键 词:微视野  黄斑水肿  光敏感度  最佳矫正视力
收稿时间:2019-12-30
修稿时间:2020-07-03

The correlation between visual acuity and microperimetry evaluation of macular edema
Zhuo-Shi Wang,Xiao-Lin Lin,Huan Wang,Yang Xi,Ling Xu and Wei He. The correlation between visual acuity and microperimetry evaluation of macular edema[J]. International Eye Science, 2020, 20(8): 1435-1438
Authors:Zhuo-Shi Wang  Xiao-Lin Lin  Huan Wang  Yang Xi  Ling Xu  Wei He
Affiliation:He Eye Specialist Hospital, Shenyang 110034, Liaoning Province, China; He University, Shenyang 110163, Liaoning Province, China,He Eye Specialist Hospital, Shenyang 110034, Liaoning Province, China,He Eye Specialist Hospital, Shenyang 110034, Liaoning Province, China,He Eye Specialist Hospital, Shenyang 110034, Liaoning Province, China,He Eye Specialist Hospital, Shenyang 110034, Liaoning Province, China and He Eye Specialist Hospital, Shenyang 110034, Liaoning Province, China; He University, Shenyang 110163, Liaoning Province, China
Abstract:AIM: To analyze the correlation between subjective mean sensitivity and visual function via macular microperimetry.

METHODS: Totally 164 eyes of 127 patients with macular edema were involved in this study. According to different diseases, they were divided into 3 groups: age-related macular degeneration(AMD)(38 eyes), retinal vein occlusion(RVO)(43 eyes)and diabetic macular edema(83 eyes)groops. All patients underwent the examinations of optometry, optical coherence tomography scanner(OCT)and microperimeter. Correlation analysis was performed using Pearson, and t-test among groups.

RESULTS: Mean sensitivity(MS)values and fixation rate(P1, P2)of total patients with macular edema were significantly correlated with their BCVA, meanwhile the CRT was negatively correlated. MS values were significantly correlated with BCVA in AMD group, but the P1, P2 and CRT were not correlated. In DME and CRVO groups, MS values and P1, P2 were significantly correlated with BCVA, and CRTs were negatively correlated in DME but not correlated in CRVO. In BRVO group, MS values and CRTs were all not correlated with BCVA.

CONCLUSION:Microperimetry is probably a better subjective assessment for AMD macular function than OCT, and could be combined with OCT for function follow-up in DME and CRVO patients. For BRVO microperimetry might indicate certain macular dysfunction that could not be detected by VA or CCT. Microperimetry could be a subjective examination for the assessment of macular edema combined with OCT.

Keywords:microperimetry   macular edema   mean sensitivity   best corrected visual acuity
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《国际眼科杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《国际眼科杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号