An International Expert Survey on Functioning in Vocational Rehabilitation Using the International Classification of Functioning,Disability and Health |
| |
Authors: | Reuben Escorpizo,Monika E. Finger,Andrea Glässel,Alarcos Cieza |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Swiss Paraplegic Research (SPF),Nottwil,Switzerland;2.ICF Research Branch of WHO Collaborating Centre for the Family of International Classifications in German,Nottwil,Switzerland;3.ICF Research Branch of WHO Collaborating Centre for the Family of International Classifications in German,Munich,Germany;4.Rehaklinik Bellikon,Bellikon,Switzerland;5.Institute for Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Research Unit for Biopsychosocial Health,Ludwig-Maximilians Universit?t,Munich,Germany;6.Department of Health Sciences and Health Policy,University of Lucerne,Nottwil,Switzerland |
| |
Abstract: | Background Vocational rehabilitation (VR) is a key process in work disability (WD) management which aims to engage or re-engage individuals to work and employment. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) by the World Health Organization (WHO) can be interfaced with VR but there is a lack of evidence of what ICF contents experts in the field consider. The objective of this study is to survey the experts in the VR field with regard to what factors are considered important to patients participating in VR using the ICF as the language to summarize the results. Methods An internet-based survey was conducted with experts from six WHO Regions (Africa, the Americas, Eastern Mediterranean, Europe, South-East Asia, and Western Pacific). Experts were asked six open-ended questions on factors that are important in VR. Each question was related to a component of the ICF (body functions, body structures, activities and, environmental factors, and personal factors). Responses were linked to the ICF. Results Using a modified stratified randomized sampling, 201 experts were sent the survey and 151 experts responded (75% response rate). We identified 101 ICF categories: 22 (21.8%) for body functions, 13 (12.9%) for body structures, 36 (35.6%) for activities and participation, and 30 (29.7%) for environmental factors. Conclusions There was a multitude of ICF functioning domains according to the respondents which indicates the complexity of VR. This expert survey has provided a list of ICF categories which could be considered in VR. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|