A comparison of intermediate and long-acting insulins in people with type 2 diabetes starting insulin: an observational database study

Aims: Insulin is normally added to oral glucose‐lowering drugs in people with type 2 diabetes when glycaemic control becomes suboptimal. We evaluated outcomes in people starting insulin therapy with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH), detemir, glargine or premixed insulins. Methods: Insulin‐naïve people with type 2 diabetes (n = 8009), ≥ 35 years old, HbA_1c≥ 6.5% and begun on NPH (n = 1463), detemir (n = 357), glargine (n = 2197) or premix (n = 3992), were identified from a UK database of primary care records (The Health Improvement Network). Unadjusted and multivariate‐adjusted analyses were conducted, with persistence of insulin therapy assessed by survival analysis. Results: In the study population (n = 4337), baseline HbA_1c was 9.5 ± 1.6%, falling to 8.4 ± 1.5% over 12 months (change ?1.1 ± 1.8%, p < 0.001). Compared with NPH, people taking detemir, glargine and premix had an adjusted reduction in HbA_1c from baseline, of 0.00% (p = 0.99), 0.19% (p < 0.001) and 0.03% (p = 0.51). Body weight increased by 2.8 kg overall (p < 0.001), and by 2.3, 1.7, 1.9, and 3.3 kg on NPH, detemir, glargine and premix (p < 0.001 for all groups); insulin dose at 12 months was 0.70 (overall), 0.64, 0.61, 0.56 and 0.76 U/kg/day. After 36 months, 57% of people on NPH, 67% on glargine and 83% on premix remained on their initially prescribed insulin. Discussion and Conclusion: In routine clinical practice, people with type 2 diabetes commenced on NPH experienced a modest disadvantage in glycaemic control after 12 months compared with other insulins. When comparing the insulins, glargine achieved best HbA_1c reduction, while premix showed greatest weight gain and the highest dose requirement, but had the best persistence of therapy.