首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

慢肺活量与用力肺活量的差异可预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者气道阻塞严重程度
引用本文:袁玮,王浩彦,徐秋芬,徐玮涵,富耀瑄,杨小丽,赵旭娟,李宾. 慢肺活量与用力肺活量的差异可预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者气道阻塞严重程度[J]. 中国呼吸与危重监护杂志, 2013, 12(4): 329-333
作者姓名:袁玮  王浩彦  徐秋芬  徐玮涵  富耀瑄  杨小丽  赵旭娟  李宾
作者单位:首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院呼吸内科,北京,100050
基金项目:首都卫生发展科研专项项目
摘    要:目的通过分析慢肺活量(VC)与用力肺活量(FVC)的差异,探讨两种肺活量指标在评估稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者气流受限程度中的作用。方法纳入200例稳定期COPD患者和114例健康受试者,行肺功能测定VC、FVC、第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、第1秒用力呼气容积占预计值百分比(FEV1%pred)。结果 COPD组VC与FVC的差值(VC-FVC)显著大于对照组[(145.40±157.50)mL比(21.10±61.30)mL,P<0.001],COPD组FVC与VC的比值(FVC/VC)显著低于对照组[(93.61±7.10)%比(99.27±2.24)%,P<0.001]。COPD组VC-FVC与FEV1%pred呈负相关(r=-0.412,P<0.001),FVC/VC与FEV1%pred呈正相关(r=0.517,P<0.001)。FEV1%pred≥50%的COPD患者VC-FVC明显小于FEV1%pred<50%的患者[(78.23±108.26)mL比(189.26±169.21)mL,P=0.003]。结论 VC-FVC和FVC/VC是简便易得的静息肺功能指标,可用作稳定期COPD患者气道阻塞严重程度的辅助诊断。

关 键 词:慢性阻塞性肺疾病  慢肺活量  用力肺活量

Difference between Slow and Forced Vital Capacity Can Predict Severity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
YUAN Wei,WANG Hao-yan,XU Qiu-fen,XU Wei-han,FU Yao-xuan,YANG Xiao-li,ZHAO Xu-juan,LI Bin. Difference between Slow and Forced Vital Capacity Can Predict Severity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2013, 12(4): 329-333
Authors:YUAN Wei  WANG Hao-yan  XU Qiu-fen  XU Wei-han  FU Yao-xuan  YANG Xiao-li  ZHAO Xu-juan  LI Bin
Affiliation:. Department of Respiratary Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University. Beijing , 100050, China Corresponding Author: WANG Hao-yan , E-mail : haoyanw@ 126. com
Abstract:Objective To evaluate if the difference between slow vital capacity (VC) and forced vital capacity (FVC) could be used to predict severity of airflow limitation in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods VC and FVC were measured in 200 patients with COPD [ 159 males;mean FEV1, (49. 31 ± 15.75 )% of predicted ] and 114 healthy controls [ 64 males; mean FEVI ,(99. 67 + 13.62)% of predicted]. Results The difference between VC and FVC (VC - FVC), which showed a negative correlation with FEVl of predicted ( r = - 0. 412, P 〈 0. 001 ), was significantly larger in the COPD patients than that in the controls [ ( 145.40 _+ 157. 50) mL vs. (21.10 + 61.30) mL,P 〈 0. 001 ]. The FVC/VC ratio was significantly lower in the COPD patients than that in the controls [ (93.61 + 7. 10)% vs. (99. 27 -+2. 24)% ,P 〈0. 001 ] ,and was positively correlated with FEV~ of predicted in the COPD patients (r =0. 517 ,P 〈0. 001 ). There was significant difference in VC- FVC in the COPD patients with FEV1 ~50% of predicted (5 patients in GOLD level 1 and 74 patients in GOLD level 2 ) and those patients with FEV1 〈 50% of predicted (106 patients in GOLD level 3 and 15 patients in GOLD level 4) [ (78.23 -+ 108. 26 ) mL vs. ( 189.26 -+ 169. 21 ) mL, P = 0. 003 ]. Conclusion The difference between VC and FVC and the FVC/VC ratio, which are more easily obtained from spirometric test, are able to detect severity of airflow limitation in patients with stable COPD.
Keywords:Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease  Slow vital capacity  Forced vital capacity
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号