首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

苦碟子注射液用药安全性的系统评价
引用本文:崔瑞昭,谢雁鸣,廖星,王冀东. 苦碟子注射液用药安全性的系统评价[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2017, 42(12): 2380-2390
作者姓名:崔瑞昭  谢雁鸣  廖星  王冀东
作者单位:中国中医科学院 中医临床基础医学研究所, 北京 100700;中国中医科学院 西苑医院, 北京 100091,中国中医科学院 中医临床基础医学研究所, 北京 100700,中国中医科学院 中医临床基础医学研究所, 北京 100700,中国中医科学院 望京医院, 北京 100102
基金项目:北京中医药大学新奥项目(1000062720062/009/005)
摘    要:系统评价苦碟子注射液用药安全性。计算机检索Cochrane图书馆、Medline、EMbase、Web of Science、Clinical Trials、CBM、CNKI、VIP、万方数据库和中国临床试验注册中心,收集关于苦碟子注射液所有研究类型文献。根据纳入排除标准筛选文献、提取资料。所有纳入研究均按目前国际上公认的方法学质量评价工具或报告质量评价标准进行评估;采用Stata 12.0软件对苦碟子注射液的不良反应(ADR)进行Meta分析。该系统评价共纳入411个研究,最终分析315个研究,使用苦碟子注射液的患者共18 072例,累计发生330例ADRs和13例AEs。最常见的ADR为中枢及外周神经系统损害,加权合并发生率为2.9%[95%CI(0.022,0.036)]。该研究分析发现苦碟子注射液总体安全性可接受,现虽系统分析了关于该药安全性病例报告的直接证据,但缺少针对该药上市后安全性的机制研究或前瞻性长期的临床观察性研究,因此关于其安全性研究还需进一步深入;同时苦碟子注射液在适应症方面,存在严重超说明书使用范围,迫切需要相关部门制定用药规范,给临床用药提供更好的指导。

关 键 词:苦碟子注射液  安全性  不良反应/事件  系统评价  Meta分析
收稿时间:2017-02-14

Systematic review of Kudiezi injection drug safety
CUI Rui-zhao,XIE Yan-ming,LIAO Xing and WANG Ji-dong. Systematic review of Kudiezi injection drug safety[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2017, 42(12): 2380-2390
Authors:CUI Rui-zhao  XIE Yan-ming  LIAO Xing  WANG Ji-dong
Affiliation:Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China;Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100091, China,Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China,Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China and Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100102, China
Abstract:To systematically evaluate the safety of Kudiezi injection. Databases such as Cochrane library, Medline, EMbase, Web of Science, Clinical Trials, CBM, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang and Chinese Clinical Trial Register were searched to collect the literature on all the study types of Kudiezi injection. Two researchers screened literature, assessed quality and extracted data according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. All studies were assessed by using internationally recognized methodological quality assessment tools or reporting quality evaluation criteria; Meta-analysis of adverse drug reaction/adverse events (ADR/AE) of Kudiezi injection was performed by using Stata 12.0 software. There were 411 clinical studies included, out of which 315 studies were analyzed finally. 18 072 patients in total used kudiezi injection, and there were 330 cases with ADRs and 13 cases with AEs. The most common ADR related system was the central and peripheral nervous system, with a weighted incidence of 2.9%[95%CI(0.022, 0.036)]. From the current evidence, the overall safety of Kudiezi injection was acceptable. Although data could be collected from all kinds of published reports, there are lack of mechanism experiments or observational studies with large samples of Kudiezi injection. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out further research on the safety of Kudiezi injection. Meanwhile, off label use of Kudiezi injection is common, so it is urgent for relevant governmental departments to formulate drug use specifications and provide better guidance for clinical drug use.
Keywords:Kudiezi injection  safety  adverse drug reaction/adverse events  systematic review  Meta-analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号