首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

三种不同药物治疗抑郁症病人的成本-效果分析
引用本文:钱东丽,侯永华,杨广声.三种不同药物治疗抑郁症病人的成本-效果分析[J].药学服务与研究,2004,4(2):136-138.
作者姓名:钱东丽  侯永华  杨广声
作者单位:新乡医学院第二附属医院精神药理教研室,新乡市,453002
摘    要:目的 :评价 3种不同药物治疗抑郁症的经济效果。 方法 :对 115例抑郁症病人随机分组 ,分别用 3种不同的药物治疗 ,A组用氯米帕明 ,B组用氟西汀 ,C组用吗氯贝胺。运用药物经济学的最小成本分析及成本 效果分析方法比较。 结果 :3种方案的疗效无显著性差异 (P >0 .0 5 ) ,B方案不良反应发生率最低、成本 效果比最低。 结论 :药物经济学在优化治疗方案、指导合理用药、减轻病人经济负担方面具有重要意义。

关 键 词:成本-效果分析  氯米帕明  氟西汀  吗氯贝胺  抑郁症
文章编号:1671-2838(2004)02-0136-03
修稿时间:2004年1月15日

Cost-effectiveness analysis of three drugs in treatment of patients with depression
QIAN Dong-Li,HOU Yong-Hua,YANG Guang-Sheng.Cost-effectiveness analysis of three drugs in treatment of patients with depression[J].Pharmaceutical Care and Research,2004,4(2):136-138.
Authors:QIAN Dong-Li  HOU Yong-Hua  YANG Guang-Sheng
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the economic effectiveness of three different drugs for treatment of patients with depression. Methods: One hundred and fifteen patients with depression were randomly divided into 3 groups. They received different therapeutic regimens, A: clomipramine, B: fluoxetine, C: moclobemide. Results: There was no significant difference in effectiveness among three different therapeutic regimens (P>0.05). The incidence of adverse drug reaction of regimen B was the lowest and the cost-effectiveness ratio of this regimen was the lowest too. Conclusion: Pharmacoeconomics plays an important role in optimizing therapeutic regimen, guiding rational use of drugs and lightening the expense of patients.
Keywords:cost-effectiveness analysis  clomipramine  fluoxetine  moclobemide  depression
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号