首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Diving decompression models and bubble metrics: Modern computer syntheses
Authors:B.R. Wienke
Affiliation:1. School of Mathematics and Actuarial Science, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, Box 210-40601, Bondo, Kenya;2. School of Mathematics, Statistics and Actuarial Science, Maseno University, Box 333, Maseno, Kenya;1. Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8205, United States;2. Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Purdue University Calumet, Hammond, IN 46323-2094, United States;1. Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Équipe Résidente de Recherche, Subaquatique Opérationnelle, BP 600 Toulon Cedex 9, France;2. Centre de recherche Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis, Centre Hospitalier Affilié Universitaire, CSSS Alphonse-Desjardins, Lévis, G6V 3Z1 QC, Canada;3. Université Laval, Département d’Anesthésiologie, Québec, QC, Canada;4. Normandie-Université, Université de Caen – Basse Normandie, Caen, France
Abstract:A quantitative summary of computer models in diving applications is presented, underscoring dual phase dynamics and quantifying metrics in tissue and blood. Algorithms covered include the multitissue, diffusion, split phase gradient, linear-exponential, asymmetric tissue, thermodynamic, varying permeability, reduced gradient bubble, tissue bubble diffusion, and linear-exponential phase models. Defining relationships are listed, and diver staging regimens are underscored. Implementations, diving sectors, and correlations are indicated for models with a history of widespread acceptance, utilization, and safe application across recreational, scientific, military, research, and technical communities. Presently, all models are incomplete, but many (included above) are useful, having resulted in diving tables, underwater meters, and dive planning software. Those herein employ varying degrees of calibration and data tuning. We discuss bubble metrics in tissue and blood as a backdrop against computer models. The past 15 years, or so, have witnessed changes and additions to diving protocols and table procedures, such as shorter nonstop time limits, slower ascent rates, shallow safety stops, ascending repetitive profiles, deep decompression stops, helium based breathing mixtures, permissible reverse profiles, multilevel techniques, both faster and slower controlling repetitive tissue halftimes, smaller critical tensions, longer flying-after-diving surface intervals, and others. Stimulated by Doppler and imaging technology, table and decompression meter development, theory, statistics, chamber and animal testing, or safer diving consensus, these modifications affect a gamut of activity, spanning bounce to decompression, single to multiday, and air to mixed gas diving. As it turns out, there is growing support for many protocols on operational, experimental, and theoretical grounds, with bubble models addressing many concerns on plausible bases, but with further testing or profile data analyses requisite.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号