首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

腹腔镜疝修补术中网片是否固定与开放式无张力疝修补术的疗效比较
引用本文:钟广俊. 腹腔镜疝修补术中网片是否固定与开放式无张力疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(2): 157-161. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.02.015
作者姓名:钟广俊
作者单位:1. 225800 江苏扬州,宝应县人民医院普外科
摘    要:目的对比腹腔镜疝修补术网片固定、网片免固定与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的有效性及安全性,以期为未来腹股沟疝治疗术式的选择提供依据。 方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2018年1月,宝应县人民医院收治的腹股沟疝93例患者的临床资料,根据手术方法分为3组:A组,腹腔镜疝修补术网片固定(34例);B组,腹腔镜疝修补术网片免固定组(31例);C组,开放式无张力疝修补术(28例)。术后随访1年,对比3组患者手术实施情况、术后并发症发生情况及复发率。 结果B组术中失血量、手术时间、术后下床活动时间、进食时间、疼痛持续时间、住院时间、术后2 d疼痛评分与A组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A、B组术中失血量少于C组,术后下床活动时间、进食时间、疼痛持续时间、住院时间短于C组,术后2 d疼痛评分低于C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);3组手术时间两两比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);3组术后并发症发生率、复发率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论腹腔镜与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝疗效相当,且患者术后均无较多并发症,安全性均理想。但因腹腔镜手术无需作较大切口,患者受到创伤小,术后恢复快,其应用价值优于开放式手术。腹腔镜术中补片在不固定的情况下仍能获得与补片固定后相似的效果,故腹腔镜网片免固定疝修补术操作简单,并发症少,临床推广价值更高。

关 键 词:腹腔镜疝修补术  网片固定  开放式无张力疝修补术  
收稿时间:2018-05-25

Comparison of efficacy of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy with or without mesh fixation and open tension-free herniorrhaphy
Guangjun Zhong. Comparison of efficacy of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy with or without mesh fixation and open tension-free herniorrhaphy[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(2): 157-161. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.02.015
Authors:Guangjun Zhong
Affiliation:1. Department of General Surgery, Baoying County People's Hospital, Yangzhou 225800, China
Abstract:ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy with or without mesh fixation and open tension-free herniorrhaphy in treatment of inguinal hernia, and to provide a basis for the choice of future inguinal hernia repair. MethodsThe clinical data of 93 cases of inguinal hernia in the Baoying County people's hospital from January 2015 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were divided into three groups by surgical procedures, group A: laparoscopic herniorrhaphy with mesh fixation (n=34), group B: laparoscopic herniorrhaphy without mesh fixation (n=31), group C: open tension-free herniorrhaphy (n=28). After 1-year postoperative follow-up, the surgical conditions, postoperative complications and recurrence rate were compared among the three groups. ResultsThere were no statistical differences in the intraoperative bleeding volume, operation time, postoperative leaving bed time, feeding time, duration of pain, hospital stays and postoperative 2 d pain score between group B and group A (P>0.05); The intraoperative bleeding volume in group A and group B was less than that in group C; the postoperative leaving bed time, feeding time, duration of pain and hospital stays in group A and group B were shorter than those in group C; the postoperative 2 d pain score in group A and group B was lower than that in group C (P<0.05); There was no statistical difference in the operation time among the three groups (P>0.05); There was no statistical difference in the incidence of postoperative complications and recurrence rate among group A, B and C (P>0.05). ConclusionThe efficacy of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy and open tension-free herniorrhaphy in the treatment of inguinal hernia are similar. All of them have satisfactory safety with less complications. However, because laparoscopic surgery does not require a large incision, the patients suffer less trauma and achieve rapid postoperative recovery, whose application value is superior to open surgery. The laparoscopic herniorrhaphy without mesh fixation can still obtain similar effects compared with laparoscopic herniorrhaphy with mesh fixation, so that laparoscopic herniorrhaphy without mesh fixation is simple in operation and less in complications, which has higher clinical promotional value.
Keywords:Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy  Mesh fixation  Open tension-free herniorrhaphy  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号