| 四种治疗难治性肺结核方案的费用-效果分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 周月红,张继明,冯小敏. 四种治疗难治性肺结核方案的费用-效果分析[J]. 药品评价, 2004, 1(3): 202-203 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 周月红 张继明 冯小敏 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江省嘉兴市第一医院药剂科,嘉兴,314000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的探讨不同的药物治疗方案对难治性肺结核的费用-效果。方法运用费用-效果分析法对A、B、C、D4种治疗难治性肺结核的方案进行分析评价。结果每种方案结核菌阴转率的费用-效果比(元/%)分别为,A:30.94,B:24.42,C:25.40,D:35.90;X片好转率的费用-效果比(元/%)分别为,A:25.61,B:21.70,C:23.34,D:30.37。结论B组为较佳治疗方案,值得推广应用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 难冶性肺结核 治疗方案 费用分析 效果分析 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-2809(2004)03-0202-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004-07-25 |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of four therapeutic schemes for difficult therapeutic pulmonary tuberculosis |
| |
| Zhou Yuehong,Zhang Jiming,FENG Xiaoming. Cost-effectiveness analysis of four therapeutic schemes for difficult therapeutic pulmonary tuberculosis[J]. Drug Evaluation, 2004, 1(3): 202-203 |
| |
| Authors: | Zhou Yuehong Zhang Jiming FENG Xiaoming |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To evaluate the economic effectiveness of different pharmacotherapeutic schemes for the same disease. Methods Using pharmacotherapeutic cost-effectiveness analysis, four therapeutic schemes for treating difficult cured tuberculosis of lung schemes A, B, C and D were compared. Results Respectively four tuberculocidal cost-effectiveness ratios of negative determine were 30.94, 24.42, 25.40, 35.90; Four cost-effectiveness ratios of X-ray improvement were 25.61, 21.70, 23.34, 30.37. Conclusion Among the four schemes, scheme B was the best one. |
| |
| Keywords: | difficult therapeutic pulmonary tuberculosis therapeutic plan payment analysis effact analysis |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
