首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Pegfilgrastim and daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: patterns of use and neutropenia-related outcomes in cancer patients in Spain – results of the LEARN Study
Authors:D. ALMENAR   md  J. MAYANS   md  O. JUAN   md  J.M. GARCIA BUENO   md  J.I. JALON LOPEZ   md  A. FRAU   md  phd   M. GUINOT   md  P. CEREZUELA   md  E. GARCIA BUSCALLA   bsc  J.A. GASQUET   phd  J. SANCHEZ   msc
Affiliation:Department of Oncology, Hospital Universitario Dr Peset, Valencia;
Department of Hematology, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia;
Department of Oncology, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia;
Department of Oncology, Hospital General Universitario, Albacete;
Department of Oncology, Clínica Rúber, Madrid;
Department of Oncology, Hospital Provincial de Castellón. Castellón;
Department of Hematology, Hospital General de Castellón, Castellón;
Department of Oncology, Hospital Santa María del Rosell, Cartagena;
Medical Department, Amgen S.A., Barcelona, Spain
Abstract:Daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factors [(G-CSFs); e.g. filgrastim, lenograstim] are frequently used to reduce the duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in cancer patients. A pegylated formulation of filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, which is administered once per cycle, was introduced in Spain in 2003. LEARN was a multi-centre, retrospective, observational study in Spain comparing patterns of use of daily G-CSF and pegfilgrastim, and CIN-related outcomes in adults with non-myeloid malignancies receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Outcome measures were the percentage of patients receiving G-CSF for primary prophylaxis versus secondary prophylaxis/treatment, duration of treatment with G-CSF and incidence of CIN-related complications. Medical records from consecutive patients with documented pegfilgrastim ( n  = 75) or daily G-CSF ( n  = 111) use during 2003 were included. The proportion of patients receiving primary or secondary prophylaxis was comparable between the pegfilgrastim (39 and 48% respectively) and daily G-CSF (40 and 48% respectively) groups. However, there was a trend towards less frequent use to treat a neutropenic event such as FN or neutropenia in the pegfilgrastim group (17 versus 30% with daily G-CSF). Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia-related complications were less frequent in patients receiving pegfilgrastim (e.g. FN 11 versus 24% with daily G-CSF). This is the first study to show the potential benefits of pegfilgrastim over daily G-CSF in Spanish clinical practice.
Keywords:pegfilgrastim    G-CSF    pattern of use    neutropenia    febrile neutropenia
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号