首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

R.E.N.A.L评分在机器人辅助肾部分切除术中的应用
引用本文:何威,谢欣,芮文斌,沈周俊. R.E.N.A.L评分在机器人辅助肾部分切除术中的应用[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2014, 0(11): 954-956
作者姓名:何威  谢欣  芮文斌  沈周俊
作者单位:上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院泌尿外科,上海200025
摘    要:目的:探讨肾脏肿瘤测量评分系统(R.E.N.A.L评分)在机器人辅助腹腔镜肾部分切除术(RALPN)中评估手术成功率和手术结果的价值。方法:2010年3月~2014年5月,回顾性分析我科施行的45例RALPN的手术数据,并进行R.E.N.A.L评分。其中低危组(R.E.N.A.L评分7分)20例,中危组(R.E.N.A.L评分7~9分)15例,高危组(R.E.N.A.L评分≥10分)10例。将三组患者手术成功率、手术数据进行比较。结果:低危组均顺利完成RALPN;中危组13例完成RALPN,2例因行RALPN困难而行机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性肾切除术(RALRN);高危组7例完成RALPN,3例行RALRN。所有手术均在机器人辅助腹腔镜下完成,无中转开放手术。低危组平均手术时间(OT)、热缺血时间(WIT)、失血量(EBL)分别为(65.0±1.4)min、(14.0±0.9)min和(35.0±4.7)ml。中危组平均OT、WIT和EBL分别为(95.0±2.7)min、(22.0±1.6)min和(110.0±7.1)ml。高危组平均OT、WIT和EBL分别为(150.0±4.9)min、(30.0±2.1)min和(320.0±15.6)ml。三组间OT、WIT和EBL的差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。三组患者术后均无并发症出现。结论:对于RALPN,术前R.E.N.A.L评分同样与手术成功率、手术时间、失血量和热缺血时间有关。R.E.N.A.L评分≥10分不应该成为RALPN的禁忌证。

关 键 词:肾部分切除术  机器人手术  R.E.N.A.L评分

Association of R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score with outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
HE Wei,XIE Xin,RUI Wenbin,SHEN Zhoujun. Association of R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score with outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy[J]. Journal of Clinical Urology, 2014, 0(11): 954-956
Authors:HE Wei  XIE Xin  RUI Wenbin  SHEN Zhoujun
Affiliation:(Department of Urology, Rui Jin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China)
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the predictive value of R.E.N.A.L(radius,exophytic/endophytic,nearness to collecting system,anterior/posterior,and location)nephrometry scoring system and to investigate its influence on perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy(RALPN).Method:From March 2010 to May 2014,45 RALPNs were divided into low risk group(R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score〈7),median risk group(R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score 7-9)and high risk group(R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score≥10).We retrospectively analyzed their perioperative data.Result:All the procedures were fulfilled successfully except that two cases in median risk group and three cases in high risk group converted to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy(RALRN).The operating time(OT),warm ischemic time(WIT)and estimated blood loss(EBL)in low risk group was(65.0±1.4)minutes,(14.0±0.9)minutes and(35.0±4.7)ml,and(95.0±2.7)minutes,(22.0±1.6)minutes and(110.0±7.1)ml in median risk group,and(150.0±4.9)minutes,(30.0±2.1)minutes and(320.0±15.6)ml in high risk group(P〈0.05).The recovery was uneventful and no complication was identified.Conclusion:R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score is considered as a predictive tool for success rate and perioperative outcomes of RALPN,and R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score≥10should not be a contraindication of RALPN.
Keywords:partial nephrectomy  robotic surgery  R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号