Limitations of the salmonella/mammalian microsome assay (AMES test) to determine occupational exposure to cytostatic drugs

Urine samples of nursing personnel working in medical oncology divisions of several Swiss hospitals were examined for mutagenic activity. Urine samples were concentrated 100 times following XAD-2 chromatography and mutagenicity was determined using the Salmonella/mammalian microsome assay (Ames test). Apart from the urine samples of patients treated with cytostatic drugs and urine samples of nurses who are cigarette smokers, no mutagenic activity could be found. Also following exposure to an increased and defined quantity of cytostatic drugs no mutagenicity could be recovered from the urine. Four different nurses worked with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cis-platinum for 3–4 hr without using any protection such as gloves, masks or a vertical laminar airflow hood. Aqueous extracts of filters, through which air was pumped during the whole experiment (a personal air-sampler was fixed near the face of the test persons), were non-mutagenic. Parallel to the mutagenicity test chemical analyses were also done. The methotrexate content was determined in serum samples and the aqueous filter extracts and urine samples were examined for cis-platinum. All chemical determinations were negative. With the aid of urine concentrates of a patient treated with sub-therapeutic doses of cyclophosphamide as well as with normal urine to which single small amounts of different cytostatics (adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, cis-platinum) were added, the detection limits for the corresponding cytostatic drugs were determined and found to be in the range of 2–10 mg for cyclophosphamide and approx. 10 μg for adriamycin. Cis-platinum was lost during the passage through the XAD-2 columns. With these results at hand the sensitivity of the hitherto preferably used method (Ames test) for the monitoring of exposure to cytostatic drugs must be seriously questioned.