首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种空气中微生物采样方法的实验观察
引用本文:覃立红,单云青,耿穗娜,杨云芳. 两种空气中微生物采样方法的实验观察[J]. 中华护理杂志, 1996, 0(9)
作者姓名:覃立红  单云青  耿穗娜  杨云芳
作者单位:第一军医大学附属南方医院,重庆沙坪坝区人民医院
摘    要:对固体撞击式采样法与平板沉降法进行初步实验,结果表明,使用固体撞击式采样法测定空气微生物的含量总数与平板沉降法采获的总数结果差异有显著性(P<0.05)。平板沉降法只能收集到较大颗粒的微生物,不能作精确的定量计数,它可作为一般卫生学的检验手段。固体撞击式采样法对悬浮于空气中小颗粒微生物捕获率高于沉降法,并能较准确地表达出空气中细菌的实际含量,是一种较理想的采样方法。

关 键 词:固体撞击式采样法,平板沉降法,空气微生物

Comparison between two types of air microorganism sampling
Qin Li-hong,Shan Yun-qing,Geng Sui-na,Yang Yun-fang. Comparison between two types of air microorganism sampling[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 1996, 0(9)
Authors:Qin Li-hong  Shan Yun-qing  Geng Sui-na  Yang Yun-fang
Abstract:The airflow striking sampling was compared with flat utensils sedimentation sampling for collection of air microorganisms.The result showed that air microorganism count with the former method is more efficient than the latter method(P<0.05).The flat utensils sedimentation sampling only collected larger particles of microorganism so the air microorganism count was not accurate.However,it is still a suitable method in hygiene without other choices.The airflow striking sampling collected more middle and tiny particles for air microorganism than the sedimentation sampling and can accurately show microorganism content in air,so it is an optimal sampling method.
Keywords:Airflow striking sampling  Flat utensils sedimentation sampling  Air microorganism.
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号