首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Meta-analysis and systematic review of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection
Authors:Srinivas R Puli  Yasuo Kakugawa  Takuji Gotoda  Daphne Antillon  Yutaka Saito  Mainor R Antillon
Institution:Srinivas R Puli, Daphne Antillon, Mainor R Antillon, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65212, United StatesYasuo Kakugawa, Takuji Gotoda, Yutaka Saito, Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
Abstract:AIM: To evaluate the proportion of successful complete cure en-bloc resections of large colorectal polyps achieved by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). METHODS: Studies using the EMR technique to resect large colorectal polyps were selected. Successful complete cure en-bloc resection was defined as one piece margin-free polyp resection. Articles were searched for in Medline, Pubmed, and the Cochrane Control Trial Registry, among other sources. RESULTS: An initial search identified 2620 reference articles, from which 429 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. Data was extracted from 25 studies (n = 5221) which met the inclusion criteria. All the studies used snares to perform EMR. Pooled proportion of en-bloc resections using a random effect model was 62.85% (95% CI: 51.50-73.52). The pooled proportion for complete cure en-bloc resections using a random effect model was 58.66% (95% CI: 47.14-69.71). With higher patient load (> 200 patients), this complete cure en-bloc resection rate improves from 44.19% (95% CI: 24.31-65.09) to 69.17% (95% CI: 51.11-84.61). CONCLUSION: EMR is an effective technique for the resection of large colorectal polyps and offers an alternative to surgery.
Keywords:Meta-analysis  Systematic review  Polyps  Endoscopic mucosal resection  En-bloc resection
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)》浏览原始摘要信息
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号