Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses in premenopausal and postmenopausal women |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands;2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Martini Hospital Groningen, the Netherlands;3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maxima Medical Center Veldhoven, the Netherlands;4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Spectrum Twente Enschede/Hospital Group Twente Almelo, the Netherlands;5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wilhelmina Hospital Assen, the Netherlands;6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nij Smellinghe Hospital Drachten, the Netherlands;7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, the Netherlands;8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, the Netherlands;9. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands;10. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Antonius Hospital Sneek, the Netherlands;11. Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands;12. Department of Gynaecologie, ‘Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis’ Amsterdam, the Netherlands;13. Department of Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, the Netherlands;14. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VieCuri Medical Center Venlo, the Netherlands;15. Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands;1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA;2. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Korea University College of Medicine, 02841 Seoul, Republic of Korea;3. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA;4. Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, CT 06520, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic adnexal mass removal in patients without preselection for benign pathology and assess the operative complications and findings.Methods: All patients presenting to the gynecologic oncology service between April 1992 and April 1996 with adnexal masses were candidates for laparoscopic management. Patients underwent preoperative radiological studies and office pelvic examination. Laparoscopic management was attempted on patients without evidence of gross metastatic disease or masses that extended above the umbilicus. Laparotomy was performed if indicated by pathologic findings or technical difficulty. All removed adnexal masses were sent for immediate pathologic diagnosis. The type of procedure, intraoperative findings, and complications were all recorded at the time of procedure.Results: One hundred sixty patients underwent laparoscopic evaluation for an adnexal mass. Benign pathology was discovered in 139 (87%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 84, 90) patients, and 141 (88%, 95% CI 86, 91) patients were managed laparoscopically. Reasons for laparotomy included technical difficulty, operative complications, or malignancy. Frozen section diagnosis was concordant with the final pathology reports in all but five patients (97% concordance), and no discrepancies resulted in treatment delays.Conclusion: Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses can be successful in a gynecologic oncology population if there is expertise in operative laparoscopy, availability of immediate accurate pathologic examination, and appropriate further treatment where indicated. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
