| 量化健康教育与随机健康教育应用效果的Meta分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 沈晓琴,崔亚玲,赵宾兰. 量化健康教育与随机健康教育应用效果的Meta分析[J]. 现代护理, 2007, 0(10) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 沈晓琴 崔亚玲 赵宾兰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南通大学医学院附属东台市第一人民医院，南通大学医学院附属东台市第一人民医院，南通大学医学院附属东台市第一人民医院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的探讨量化健康教育与随机健康教育的应用效果。方法按照系统评价的要求全面检索了中国数字医院图书馆(www.chkd.chki.net)、中国医学科学院的中国生物医学文献光盘数据库(CBMdisk),对符合纳入标准的10篇文献共计1414例患者进行Meta分析。结果量化健康教育组与随机健康教育组对宣教内容的掌握、患者依从性和临床满意度方面有显著性差异(P<0.00001)。结论量化健康教育比随机健康教育的应用效果好。
|
| 关 键 词： | 健康教育 方法 Meta分析 |
A meta-analysis of effect of standardization health education and random health education |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To estimate the effect of standardization health education and random health educaiton. Methods According to the requirements of Cochrane systematic review ,a thorough literature search was performed among Chinese digital Hospital Library (www.chkd.cnki.net) and Chinese Biomedical Literature Disk Database (CBM disk).A-meta analysis was performed on a total of 1414 patients involved in 10 papers which met the inclusion criteria.Results The patients have better understanding to the content while receiving the standardization health education; they are more compliance and satisfied with the standardization health education. The two groups have significant difference(P<0.00001).Conclusions Standardization health education has higher effect than random health education. |
| |
| Keywords: | Health education Method Meta-analysis |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
